RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Suggestions re. 'Straw' Recommendations and Personal Views
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "GNSO RN WG" <gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Suggestions re. 'Straw' Recommendations and Personal Views
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:54:19 -0500
For any issues for which we as a WG are unable to develop a position
that everyone supports, an opportunity for individuals to submit
minority views will be provided and any such minority oppinions will be
included in our report.
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 11:17 AM
> To: GNSO RN WG
> Subject: Re: [gnso-rn-wg] Suggestions re. 'Straw'
> Recommendations and Personal Views
> On 16 feb 2007, at 15.50, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > Ultimately, the 'straw' recommendations will be reviewed,
> > revised as necessary and finally converted into final
> > approved by the full WG, so it is important to be able to
> support your
> > recommendations with information from the other parts of
> your report
> > and not your own personal opinions.
> If we have differences of opinion on the straw
> recommendations will these be conveyed to the council as
> well? Will we need to write minority reports of some sort?
> While it is possible that we will all agree on every
> recommendation, something tells me not to expect it.