<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-rn-wg] consensus and minority statements
- To: "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-rn-wg] consensus and minority statements
- From: marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 16:02:02 +0000
One thought that occured to me --I recall that we were cautious in the two
rapporteur groups on PDP 06 not to rely on 'support' at the sub group level,
but to focus on the support at the full TF.
I realoze that makes it essential for everyone to read and understand all the
reports/recommendations. So that brings to mind one question-
Chuck, i am wondering if we will need an addtional 30 min or so on the final
call?
Regards,
Marilyn Cade
-----Original Message-----
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:29:14
To:"Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:<gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Thanks to Marilyn
Yes Tim. I think that is correct, but the subgroups could certainly
apply the advice in finalizing their recommendations. You are also
correct about the process.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 8:13 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Thanks to Marilyn
>
> I understood the direction about rough consensus to refer to
> the WG as a whole. Is that correct? If so, then the
> sub-groups can only comment on rough consensus regarding
> their particular group and its recommendation. Rough
> consensus of the group would come after the sub-groups are
> done and their work is reviewed. Is that the process we'll be
> following?
>
> Tim
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-rn-wg] Thanks to Marilyn
> From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, May 04, 2007 7:00 am
> To: <gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> I want to communicate special thanks to Marilyn for chairing
> the meeting yesterday. I sincerely appreciate that. And I
> also want to thank all of you for the work you are doing as
> we wrap up our work. As you are all aware, we are down to
> the wire and will have a busy next six days to wrap things up.
>
> Please note that in cases where we were not able to complete
> work or are not able to reach rough consensus, the Council
> gave us direction in Lisbon that we should maintain the
> status quo until such time that further work can be done.
> Please apply this direction as you finalize your
> recommendations in the subgroups.
>
> I will provide more guidance after I listen to the MP3. In
> the meantime, if you have any questions, please let me know.
>
> Chuck Gomes
>
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information
> that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure
> under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or
> disclosure is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this message in error, please notify
> sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|