ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-rn-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Tagged Names Report

  • To: <gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-rn-wg] Tagged Names Report
  • From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <mxr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 08:55:35 -0700

I imagine (without any real knowledge…) that Tokyo and Beijing could be 
represented differently in those scripts.  What happens when there is more than 
one appropriate U-label?  Is this where we employ the “one string per 
application” rule, and any other strings would be confusingly similar and 
therefore not allowable?   Or, could the applicant have several variants all 
resolving to the same xn-TLD?  

 

The latter seems to make sense to me to maximize the utility of the TLD, but 
that would mean that Verisign probably ought to get .comm or .com with an 
umlaut?

 

Mike Rodenbaugh

Sr. Legal Director

Yahoo! Inc.

 

NOTICE:  This communication is confidential and may be protected by 
attorney-client and/or work product privilege.  If you are not the intended 
recipient, please notify me by reply, and delete this communication and any 
attachments.

  _____  

From: owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 7:35 AM
To: gnso-rn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-rn-wg] Tagged Names Report

 

Here is the final version of the second recommendation for the Tagged Names 
Report.  It is now ready for full WG approval:

 

For each IDN gTLD proposed, applicant must provide both the "ASCII compatible 
encoding"  (“A-label”) and the “Unicode display form” (“U-label”)[1][1].  For 
example:

*       If the Chinese word for ‘Beijing’ is proposed as a new gTLD, the 
applicant would be required to provide the A-label (xn--1lq90i) and the U-label 
(北京).

*       If the Japanese word for ‘Tokyo’ is proposed as a new gTLD, the 
applicant would be required to provide the A-label (xn--1lqs71d) and the 
U-label (東京). 

 The will send the full report later.




  _____  

 

Chuck Gomes

 

"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it 
is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and 
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, 
distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the 
original transmission." 

 


  _____  

[1][1] Internet Draft IDNAbis Issues: 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-klensin-idnabis-issues-01.txt 
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-klensin-idnabis-issues-01.txt>  (J. 
Klensin), Section 3.1.1.1



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy