Re: [gnso-rn-wg] CORRECTION - Hold over of a supported CN recommendation from RNv1

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

correcting a cut and paste error

a.


On 9 maj 2007, at 17.51, Avri Doria wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In terms of the content you removed when normalizing the report, I  
> think only one bit of the previous recommendations was not either  
> repeated or reworked.  Specifically the processes dealing with what  
> happens to an application when a CN process is initiated.
> I suggest we insert the following in the requirements as the third  
> requirement.
>
> In the event of the initiation of a CN-DRP process,
> applications for that label will be placed in a HOLD
> status that would allow for the dispute to be further
> examined. If the dispute is dismissed or
> otherwise resolved favorably, the applications
> will reenter the processing queue. The period
> of time allowed for dispute should be finite and
> should be relegated to a, yet to be defined,
> external dispute resolution process. The external
> dispute process should be defined to be
> objective, neutral, and transparent.  The
> outcome of any dispute shall not result in the
> development of new categories of Reserved
> Names.
>
>
> thanks
> a.