[gnso-rn-wg] Hold over of a supported CN recommendation from RNv1

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

In terms of the content you removed when normalizing the report, I  
think only one bit of the previous recommendations was not either  
repeated or reworked.  Specifically the processes dealing with what  
happens to an application when a CN process is initiated.

I suggest we insert the following in the requirements as the third  
requirement.


1. Propose creating a category called Controversial
Names for use at the top level only. A label that
is applied for would be considered Controversial
if during the Public Comment phase of the new
gTLD application process the label becomes
disputed by a formal notice of a consensus
position or other formally supported decision
process from an ICANN Advisory Committee or
ICANN Supporting Organization, and otherwise
meets the definition of Controversial Names as
defined above.
In the event of the initiation of a CN-DRP process,
applications for that label will be placed in a HOLD
status that would allow for the dispute to be further
examined. If the dispute is dismissed or
otherwise resolved favorably, the applications
will reenter the processing queue. The period
of time allowed for dispute should be finite and
should be relegated to a, yet to be defined,
external dispute resolution process. The external
dispute process should be defined to be
objective, neutral, and transparent.  The
outcome of any dispute shall not result in the
development of new categories of Reserved
Names.


thanks
a.