<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-rrc-a] Re: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for Monday's Session
- To: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-rrc-a] Re: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for Monday's Session
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:48:35 -0400
+1
On 16 Jun 2010, at 14:34, Metalitz, Steven wrote:
> I disagree, this is part of our assignment, and part of our report. It is up
> for public comment and should be at least mentioned in the presentation.
>
> From: Hammock, Statton [mailto:shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:01 PM
> To: Metalitz, Steven; Margie Milam; gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-rrc-a@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for Monday's
> Session
>
> Steve,
>
> I am not sure that I agree that we should have a slide that lays out the
> three staked out positions on next steps because this might generate a debate
> on this particular topic which is not the purpose of the meeting, nor I
> believe, the forum for it. We need to be sure we complete our presentation
> and that we have enough time for the panel discussion.
>
> Statton
>
>
>
> From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 4:49 PM
> To: Margie Milam; gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-rrc-a@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for Monday's
> Session
>
> Thanks Margie, these look good.
>
> (1) We need an additional slide regarding the recommended next steps on RAA
> amendments (this would go just before law enforcement perspectives):
>
> Strong Support: Include observers in negotiations (representing interests of
> affected non-parties)
>
> Substantial Opposition: Only registrars and ICANN staff in negotiations
>
> Some Subteam Members: Third parties should be full participants in
> negotiations
>
> Agreement that there must be periodic reports from negotiations, including
> text.
>
> (2) Should the blank slide read "Questions/Comments"?
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
> From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Margie Milam
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 3:38 PM
> To: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-rrc-a@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for Monday's
> Session
>
> Dear All,
>
> Please find attached for your review draft slides for Monday’s presentation
> on the RAA Initial Report.
>
> Please provide your comments or revisions by COB on this Thursday, 17 June
> 2010.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Margie
>
> _______________
> Margie Milam
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN
> _______________
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|