ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-rrc-a]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-rrc-a] Re: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for Monday's Session

  • To: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-rrc-a] Re: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for Monday's Session
  • From: Holly Raiche <h.raiche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:20:01 +1000

I think we are up to 3+

But I do share Stratton's concern that the discussion becomes bogged down in a way forward - I had hoped that the discussion would centre on the issues we spent time on. Maybe have a slide at the end - so we can get through the issues identified - and then talk about away forward

Holly
On 17/06/2010, at 6:29 AM, Rosette, Kristina wrote:


+1 (or should that be 2?)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa- b@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 3:49 PM
To: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-rrc-a@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for
Monday's Session


+1


On 16 Jun 2010, at 14:34, Metalitz, Steven wrote:

I disagree, this is part of our assignment, and part of our report.
It is up for public comment and should be at least mentioned in the
presentation.

From: Hammock, Statton [mailto:shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:01 PM
To: Metalitz, Steven; Margie Milam; gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx;
gnso-rrc-a@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for
Monday's Session

Steve,

I am not sure that I agree that we should have a slide that lays out
the three staked out positions on next steps because this might generate
a debate on this particular topic which is not the purpose of the
meeting, nor I believe, the forum for it.  We need to be sure we
complete our presentation and that we have enough time for the panel
discussion.

Statton



From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 4:49 PM
To: Margie Milam; gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-rrc-a@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for
Monday's Session

Thanks Margie, these look good.

(1) We need an additional slide regarding the recommended next steps
on RAA amendments (this would go just before law enforcement
perspectives):

Strong Support:  Include observers in negotiations (representing
interests of affected non-parties)

Substantial Opposition:  Only registrars and ICANN staff in
negotiations

Some Subteam Members:  Third parties should be full participants in
negotiations

Agreement that there must be periodic reports from negotiations,
including text.

(2)  Should the blank slide read "Questions/Comments"?

Steve





From: owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 3:38 PM
To: gnso-raa-b@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-rrc-a@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-raa-b] Draft Presentation on Initial Report for
Monday's Session

Dear All,

Please find attached for your review draft slides  for Monday's
presentation on the RAA Initial Report.

Please provide your comments or revisions by COB on this Thursday, 17
June 2010.

Best regards,

Margie

_______________
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_______________




Kind regards

Holly Raiche
Executive Director,
Internet Society of Australia (ISOC-AU)
ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mob: 0412 688 544
Ph: (02) 9436 2149

The Internet is For Everyone






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy