[gnso-sg1-vi-feb10] GNSO sub-group 1 - Analysis Team - Vertical Integration PDP mailing list

[Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,

The sub - working group - Analysis Team - mailing list is:

Gnso-sg1-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx ( = gnso sub-group 1 - Vertical Integration 
February 10)

Public archives are at:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-sg1-vi-feb10/

the list can be found on page
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/index.htm

under:
GNSO Mailing Lists
•Vertical Integration PDP Working Group 
◦Vertical Integration PDP WG - Sub-Group 1

Subscribed to the list:
(see: 
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/vertical-integration/soi-vi-pdp-wg-01apr10-en)

Berry Cobb
Mikey O'Connor
Roberto Gaetano
Rahman Khan
Md. Jahangir Hossain
Phil Buckingham
Keith Drazek 
Jean Christophe VIGNES
Alan Greenberg  
Ken Stubbs 
Volker Greimann 
Brian Cute 
Steve Pinkos 
Richard Tindal

ICANN Staff:

Liz Gasster
Mike Zupke
Margie Milam
Marika Konings
Glen de Saint Géry
Gisella Gruber-White

Please let me know who else should be added to the list.
Thank you.
Kind regards,

Glen


Gisella,

Thank you for the assistance, we will gladly take you up on your
offer.   Can you assist with the following, please?  During the call,
we determined that our mission will be brief, but require the luxuries
of a longer duration group.

1.      Doodle setup.  We need two 1-hour meetings targeting the early part
of the weeks, 4/26 & 5/3.  I know schedules are tight, but Monday
prior to the VI call in between RAP is preferable.  If possible,
include times in the doodle to span whatever slots are available Mon ?
Thu.
2.      The conference call setup will require the recorded option.  It
will be important for us to go back and reference our discussion and
maintain a record.  No transcription is required.
3.      Will it be possible to get a VI sub-team mailing address setup?  We
determined much work will occur on the list over the next three weeks.

Proposed schedule:
Week of 4/26 ? Meeting #2
4/30 ? Draft #1 of Evaluation matrix
Week of 5/3 ? Meeting #3
5/7 ? Near Final Draft #2 of Evaluations matrix

Thank you for your assistance.  Please advise if you require further
information from me.  Take care, B.

Berry Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC


From: Gisella Gruber-White 

Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 6:49 AM
Subject: Re: Dial-in details / Analysis team - Thursday 22 April at 1400 UTC


Dear Mikey and Berry,

Please let me know whether this group will be meeting on a regular
basis ? in which case we could set up a mailing list.

Also, I am happy to assist with scheduling these meetings ? in this
way, we won?t have any overlapping WG?s (today we have the PPSC PDP
that Alan is on from 1330 to 1500 UTC).

Thank you
Kind regards
Gisella

On 22/04/2010 00:40, "Gisella Gruber-White"


Dear Mikey and Berry,

The LEADER passcode for this call is:

Thank you
Kind regards
Gisella


------ Forwarded Message
From: Gisella Gruber-White >, 
Subject: Dial-in details /  Analysis team - Thursday 22 April at 1400 UTC

Dear All,

Please find hereafter the dial-in details for the Analysis Team call
on Thursday 22 April 2010 at 1400 UTC.

Please note that this call will not be recorded nor transcribed.

(for other places see: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedform.html)

Passcodes:      

Dial in numbers:

Country                              Toll Numbers
Freephone/Toll Free Number



On 21/04/2010 13:24, "Mike O'Connor" wrote:

> hi Berry and Gisella,
>
> a quick note to you two to share the results of the Doodle poll for
> an Analysis sub-team call.  Berry, i'm sorry, i screwed up the
> "noon" slot on the poll and it came out "midnight" (Central time) --
> that's why there's that one outlier.  looks like you've really only
> got one slot that works -- given that Berry needs to be on the call.
>  that slot is 1400 UST tomorrow (Thursday).  Gisella, can you
> coordinate a conference bridge for Berry?  i think it can be one of
> those el-cheapo ones rather than the full-blown monitored ones we
> use on the big calls.  mikey
>
>
> On Apr 20, 2010, at 1:37 AM, wrote:
>
>>
>> VIA Team:
>>
>> If you will allow, I volunteer to act as "Convener" for the VI
>> Analysis sub-team.  I have not been much of a vocal member, nor
>> will I consider myself an expert at economic theory.  I do,
>> however, follow practically every message that crosses the VI wire,
>> attend each VI conference call, and I participated on the VI
>> drafting team.  I will also admit to my inexperience of the DNS
>> industry, but I find this to be my greatest strength with my lack
>> of entrenched bias.  I have been involved with ICANN for just over
>> a year and a few months shy of one year membership with the CBUC.
>> I have formed my own opinions about what VI should look like going
>> forward, but after a thorough analysis of each proposals, my
>> opinion can be swayed to the proposal that I believe to be in the
>> best interest for ICANN, Contracted Parties, Consumers, Industry
>> Participants, and the Market.  Did I leave anyone out?  Lastly, I
>> have no affiliation with any Ry, Rr, nor am I a prospective gTLD
>> applicant.  I would love to be an applicant, but I am not.  Perhaps
>> the second round.  You can find my SOI @
>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-vi-feb10/msg00293.html
>>
>> Regardless of Convener, I have attached a straw man of attributes
>> that I collected from the list and calls.  This is by no means
>> comprehensive.  My intent is to create a checklist of these
>> attributes that we should consider across each proposal.  It is my
>> hope that most of these can become binary or multiple choice
>> answers in which we start to quantify each attribute.  To the right
>> of the binary/multichoice flag would be a space to comment/expand
>> on the attribute.  Each proposal can then be compared by row
>> attribute.  So that's the general thought and I most certainly
>> welcome feedback, likes, gripes, complaints and moans.
>>
>> I think that takes care a few of Mikey's list below.
>>
>> I would like to add that we should schedule some time for one or a
>> few conference calls to hash through the development of the
>> framework.  I suggest we get a doodle out ASAP and try to get a few
>> sessions scheduled.
>>
>> Please advise of any comments and questions.  Thank you.
>>
>>
>> Berry Cobb
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Subject: Analysis team -- kickoff
>>
>> hello Analysis Team members,
>>
>> this is a note just to you -- i figure we'll probably be more
>> popular if we don't flood the general list with our internal
>> correspondence.
>>
>> i think there are just a few steps in this first-week workplan
>>
>> 1) identify a "convener" -- a person who wants to lead the
>> conversation and nudge the rest of us along -- goal - today
>>
>> 2) identify a "scribe" -- a person who would be willing to maintain
>> a current draft of our list of evaluation criteria -- goal - today
>>
>> 3) brainstorm up a bunch of criteria -- goal - mid-week
>>
>> 4) develop a first draft and push it out to the list -- goal - end
>> of the week
>>
>> 5) take feedback on the next weekly call
>>
>> sound like a plan?  anybody want to step up for #1 or #2?  anything
>> you need from me/Roberto?
>>
>> mikey
>>