Re: [gnso-sg1-vi-feb10] VI principles identified in proposals

[Richard Tindal <richardtindal@xxxxxx>]

thanks Mike

as far as I can see you've captured every issue/ scenario

RT



On Apr 26, 2010, at 8:32 PM, Mike Zupke wrote:

> Greetings, VI Evaluation Team,
> 
> As promised on today's call, I've attached a list of the principles I
> identified in all of the VI proposals submitted to date.  As you'll note
> from the message below, I just presented this to the group of proposal
> sponsors for feedback, so this outline should be considered to be in draft
> form (or, more accurately, pre-draft).
> 
> After getting the list of "principles" right, we'll ask the proposal
> sponsors to indicate which of the principles are addressed in their
> proposals, and distribute a comprehensive table to the working group.
> Eventually, the goal in this would be to identify, as best possible, where
> there is consensus (at least among the proposals) and work toward a group
> proposal that might be taken to the GNSO.
> 
> As always, please let me know if you have any questions or feedback.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Mike Zupke
> Registrar Liaison Manager
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
> 
> ------ Forwarded Message
> From: Mike Zupke <mike.zupke@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:22:48 -0700
> To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Eckhaus
> <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>, Eric
> Brunner-Williams <brunner@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, Michael
> Palage <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>, Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>, Kathy
> Kleiman <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>, Phil Buckingham <pjbuckingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Brian Cute <briancute@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jean Christophe VIGNES
> <jcvignes@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Michele Neylon :: Blacknight"
> <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>,
> Volker Greimann - Key-Systems GmbH <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Ruiz
> <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Conversation: VI principles identified in proposals - for your review and
> feedback
> Subject: VI principles identified in proposals - for your review and
> feedback
> 
> Greetings, VI proposal sponsors,
> 
> I have attempted to identify all of the principles set forth in the VI
> proposals received to date and summarize them concisely in the attached Word
> document. I was fairly broad/liberal in the summarized principles in order
> to help identify potential areas of overlap and consensus, so some of these
> might appear similar to principles you proposed, but perhaps not exactly
> what you intended.  Before compiling these into a more final table and
> asking you to indicate which principles your proposal supports/incorporates
> (as a reference tool for the rest of the working group), we'd like to make
> sure the list of principles that will populate the table is sufficiently
> complete.  
> 
> So, if you would kindly review the list of VI principles identified in my
> document and provide me with any feedback you have about the thoroughness &
> accuracy of the list as to your proposal, in the form of a redlined version
> in the next day or two, I'd appreciate it.  Specifically, I'm asking you to
> review the list and call out any areas where you think something from your
> proposal is missing or perhaps misstated.  (The list isn't as long as it
> looks, I promise!)  Please bear in mind that I left out the definitions that
> were provided in a couple proposals because I think that is probably best
> left to the next round of discussion.
> 
> Thanks in advance for your assistance in this.  Please let me know if you
> have any questions or if you think you'll need more time.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Mike Zupke
> Registrar Liaison Manager
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
> 
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
> 
> <VI_summary_of_proposal_principles MZ3.doc>