ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-sl-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email

  • To: "Patrick Jones" <patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:57:59 -0400

What am I missing?  Are you not talking about 2-character names?
'Single letter and digits' does not sound like a 2-character name.  Is
there a problem with the term ASCII; it seems to me that it makes it
clearer; for example, an <accented e> would not be allowed because it is
not an ASCII letter but it is an example of one letter.
 
Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 


________________________________

        From: Patrick Jones [mailto:patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 2:51 PM
        To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email
        
        

        No. From my understanding based on conversations with experts,
"one ASCII letter and one ASCII number" is not accurate. Single letter
and digits (in either order) is probably ok.

         

        Patrick

         

        
________________________________


        From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 11:45 AM
        To: Patrick Jones; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email

         

        Would it be clearer to say it like this:  "Applications may be
considered for two-character names of one ASCII letter and one ASCII
number (in either order) at the top level in accordance with the terms
set forth in the new gTLD process. Examples include .3F, .A1, .u7."

         

        Chuck Gomes

         

        "This message is intended for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify
sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 

         

                 

                
________________________________


                From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Patrick Jones
                Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 2:36 PM
                To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
                Subject: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email

                There was an error in my last email, the recommendation
should have read: "Applications may be considered for single letter,
single digit combinations at the top level in accordance with the terms
set forth in the new gTLD process. Examples include .3F, .A1, .u7."

                 

                Any comments?

                 

                Patrick L. Jones

                Registry Liaison Manager

                Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

                4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330

                Marina del Rey, CA 90292

                Tel: +1 310 301 3861

                Fax: +1 310 823 8649

                patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx 

                 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy