RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email

["Patrick Jones" <patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx>]

The clarification "two character names consisting of a single letter and
single digit, in either order" is probably more accurate. In my discussion
last week with Tina & Cary, it was suggested that using "ASCII letter and
number" was not quite accurate, and we should use LDH (letters, digits,
hyphens) instead. An <accented e> would be covered under the term
"character" in our consideration of IDNs.

 

I am checking again with Tina to make sure I have captured this correctly.

 

Patrick

 

  _____  

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 11:58 AM
To: Patrick Jones; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email

 

What am I missing?  Are you not talking about 2-character names?  'Single
letter and digits' does not sound like a 2-character name.  Is there a
problem with the term ASCII; it seems to me that it makes it clearer; for
example, an <accented e> would not be allowed because it is not an ASCII
letter but it is an example of one letter.

 

Chuck Gomes

 

"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and
destroy/delete the original transmission." 

 

 


  _____  


From: Patrick Jones [mailto:patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 2:51 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email

No. From my understanding based on conversations with experts, "one ASCII
letter and one ASCII number" is not accurate. Single letter and digits (in
either order) is probably ok.

 

Patrick

 


  _____  


From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 11:45 AM
To: Patrick Jones; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email

 

Would it be clearer to say it like this:  "Applications may be considered
for two-character names of one ASCII letter and one ASCII number (in either
order) at the top level in accordance with the terms set forth in the new
gTLD process. Examples include .3F, .A1, .u7."

 

Chuck Gomes

 

"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and
destroy/delete the original transmission." 

 

 


  _____  


From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Patrick Jones
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 2:36 PM
To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email

There was an error in my last email, the recommendation should have read:
"Applications may be considered for single letter, single digit combinations
at the top level in accordance with the terms set forth in the new gTLD
process. Examples include .3F, .A1, .u7."

 

Any comments?

 

Patrick L. Jones

Registry Liaison Manager

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330

Marina del Rey, CA 90292

Tel: +1 310 301 3861

Fax: +1 310 823 8649

patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx