RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Using 'digit' instead of 'number' is better; I missed that.  But it
still seems like 'ASCII' would be okay although I am okay without it.
 
Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Patrick Jones
        Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 3:08 PM
        To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email
        
        

        The clarification "two character names consisting of a single
letter and single digit, in either order" is probably more accurate. In
my discussion last week with Tina & Cary, it was suggested that using
"ASCII letter and number" was not quite accurate, and we should use LDH
(letters, digits, hyphens) instead. An <accented e> would be covered
under the term "character" in our consideration of IDNs.

         

        I am checking again with Tina to make sure I have captured this
correctly.

         

        Patrick

         

        
________________________________


        From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 11:58 AM
        To: Patrick Jones; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email

         

        What am I missing?  Are you not talking about 2-character names?
'Single letter and digits' does not sound like a 2-character name.  Is
there a problem with the term ASCII; it seems to me that it makes it
clearer; for example, an <accented e> would not be allowed because it is
not an ASCII letter but it is an example of one letter.

         

        Chuck Gomes

         

        "This message is intended for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify
sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 

         

                 

                
________________________________


                From: Patrick Jones [mailto:patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx] 
                Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 2:51 PM
                To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
                Subject: RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email

                No. From my understanding based on conversations with
experts, "one ASCII letter and one ASCII number" is not accurate. Single
letter and digits (in either order) is probably ok.

                 

                Patrick

                 

                
________________________________


                From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
                Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 11:45 AM
                To: Patrick Jones; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
                Subject: RE: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last email

                 

                Would it be clearer to say it like this:  "Applications
may be considered for two-character names of one ASCII letter and one
ASCII number (in either order) at the top level in accordance with the
terms set forth in the new gTLD process. Examples include .3F, .A1,
.u7."

                 

                Chuck Gomes

                 

                "This message is intended for the use of the individual
or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify
sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 

                 

                         

                        
________________________________


                        From: owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Patrick Jones
                        Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 2:36 PM
                        To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
                        Subject: [gnso-sl-wg] Clarification to last
email

                        There was an error in my last email, the
recommendation should have read: "Applications may be considered for
single letter, single digit combinations at the top level in accordance
with the terms set forth in the new gTLD process. Examples include .3F,
.A1, .u7."

                         

                        Any comments?

                         

                        Patrick L. Jones

                        Registry Liaison Manager

                        Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and
Numbers

                        4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330

                        Marina del Rey, CA 90292

                        Tel: +1 310 301 3861

                        Fax: +1 310 823 8649

                        patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx