[gnso-sl-wg] RE: Revised Single and Two-character subgroup report

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Patrick,
 
You can go ahead and assume full WG approval because when we are done
the recommendations we include will need full WG approval. For now, word
it like the full WG already approved the recommendations.  We will deal
with any changes needed later.
 
Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 


________________________________

        From: Patrick Jones [mailto:patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 11:56 AM
        To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Cc: 'Liz Williams'
        Subject: RE: Revised Single and Two-character subgroup report
        
        

        The original recommendations were approved by the WG for the 19
march report, but yes, since we have gone back and updated some of the
recommendations, it may be best to state that the full WG will have an
opportunity to consider these recommendations at the 3 May WG call.

         

        Which category are you referring to? Single letter, single digit
combinations at the top level? We have examples listed (3F, a1, u7, etc)
Combinations of one letter and one digit at the top level is fine. A two
character name consisting of two digits is already permitted at the
second level.

         

        Patrick

         

        
________________________________


        From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 8:50 AM
        To: Patrick Jones; gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
        Cc: Liz Williams
        Subject: RE: Revised Single and Two-character subgroup report

         

        Is the following in item 3 of the Executive Summary a true
statement: "The recommendations of this report were approved by the RN
WG for inclusion in the 19 March 2007 report."?  Aren't the
recommendations in this report going to be different than the ones
approved for the 19 March report?

         

        Am I the only one who thinks that the following is not a clear
way to indicate that you are talking about 2-letter or 2 digit names or
combinations of 1 letter and 1 digit: "Single  Letter/Single  Digit
Combinations"?  Also, the wording would seem to imply the possibility of
2-digits.  How about "Combinations of one letter and one digit"?

         

        The format for the Supporting Information is not exactly what I
suggested but I personally think the way you did it is a much better fit
for your report.  As long as Liz is okay with it, I think it works well.

         

         

         

         

        Chuck Gomes

         

        "This message is intended for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify
sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 

         

                 

                
________________________________


                From: Patrick Jones [mailto:patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx] 
                Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 7:49 PM
                To: gnso-sl-wg@xxxxxxxxx
                Cc: Gomes, Chuck; 'Liz Williams'
                Subject: Revised Single and Two-character subgroup
report

                Attached is an updated single and two character subgroup
report, with hopefully the last format update we'll do before inclusion
of the report into the final WG report next week. Please note that I
have incorporated the recommendations sent yesterday by Marilyn, updated
the symbols definition based on our discussion on the subgroup call,
added material to the single and two character IDN section, revised the
digits at the top level category, and added material to the supporting
resources at the end. I also updated the recommendation on single letter
single digit combinations at the top level.

                 

                Patrick

                 

                Patrick L. Jones

                Registry Liaison Manager

                Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

                4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330

                Marina del Rey, CA 90292

                Tel: +1 310 301 3861

                Fax: +1 310 823 8649

                patrick.jones@xxxxxxxxx