<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-stability-thickwhois] Kickoff
- To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-stability-thickwhois] Kickoff
- From: Carolyn Hoover <choover@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:40:14 +0000
Sounds like a reasonable plan. I don't have the WG calendar handy. Are there
dates we need to hit for each of these steps to be in alignment with that
calendar?
Carolyn
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 9:56 AM
To: gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-stability-thickwhois] Kickoff
I am afraid that I have had to focus on other issues until now, but given that
stakeholder input is just now arriving, this is probably a good time to start
work in earnest.
The members of this sub-group are:
* Alan Greenberg (ALAC)
* Carolyn Hoover (RySG)
* Tim Ruiz (RrSG)
* Jeff Neuman (RySG)
* Christopher E George (IPC)
* Frederic Guillemaut (RrSG)
As I understand it, we are looking at two issues:
- Stability, with a focus on the implications and requirements of having
multiple repositories of Whois data.
- Data Escrow document what is done and investigate if any changes are required
or recommended.
I suggest the following for our work-plan:
1. Discussion and enhancement (if applicable) of topics to be addressed - on
list.
2. Individual review of stakeholder input.
3. Schedule a call to to discuss issues.
4. Draft summary/report
Comments?
Alan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|