RE: [gnso-stability-thickwhois] Kickoff

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Sounds like a reasonable plan.  Can someone just forward around the relevant 
section(s) of the charter that deal with this issue as a starting point?  I 
cannot recall as to why stability was even an issue.

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carolyn Hoover
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:40 AM
To: Alan Greenberg; gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-stability-thickwhois] Kickoff


Sounds like a reasonable plan.  I don't have the WG calendar handy.  Are there 
dates we need to hit for each of these steps to be in alignment with that 
calendar?

Carolyn

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 9:56 AM
To: gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-stability-thickwhois] Kickoff


I am afraid that I have had to focus on other issues until now, but given that 
stakeholder input is just now arriving, this is probably a good time to start 
work in earnest.

The members of this sub-group are:
*        Alan Greenberg (ALAC)
*        Carolyn Hoover (RySG)
*        Tim Ruiz (RrSG)
*        Jeff Neuman (RySG)
*        Christopher E George (IPC)
*        Frederic Guillemaut (RrSG)

As I understand it, we are looking at two issues:

- Stability, with a focus on the implications and requirements of having 
multiple repositories of Whois data.
- Data Escrow document what is done and investigate if any changes are required 
or recommended.

I suggest the following for our work-plan:

1. Discussion and enhancement (if applicable) of topics to be addressed - on 
list.
2. Individual review of stakeholder input.
3. Schedule a call to to discuss issues.
4. Draft summary/report

Comments?

Alan