RE: [gnso-stability-thickwhois] Kickoff

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'm not sure it is really an "issue". If I remember correctly, it 
came out of the brainstorming of all the possible changes and 
implications associated with a thin-to-thick transition.
I will dig out the charter.

Alan

At 15/01/2013 10:44 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
> Sounds like a reasonable plan.  Can someone just forward around the 
> relevant section(s) of the charter that deal with this issue as a 
> starting point?  I cannot recall as to why stability was even an issue.
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carolyn Hoover
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:40 AM
> To: Alan Greenberg; gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-stability-thickwhois] Kickoff
>
>
> Sounds like a reasonable plan.  I don't have the WG calendar 
> handy.  Are there dates we need to hit for each of these steps to be 
> in alignment with that calendar?
> Carolyn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 9:56 AM
> To: gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-stability-thickwhois] Kickoff
>
>
> I am afraid that I have had to focus on other issues until now, but 
> given that stakeholder input is just now arriving, this is probably 
> a good time to start work in earnest.
> The members of this sub-group are:
> *        Alan Greenberg (ALAC)
> *        Carolyn Hoover (RySG)
> *        Tim Ruiz (RrSG)
> *        Jeff Neuman (RySG)
> *        Christopher E George (IPC)
> *        Frederic Guillemaut (RrSG)
>
> As I understand it, we are looking at two issues:
>
> - Stability, with a focus on the implications and requirements of 
> having multiple repositories of Whois data.
> - Data Escrow document what is done and investigate if any changes 
> are required or recommended.
> I suggest the following for our work-plan:
>
> 1. Discussion and enhancement (if applicable) of topics to be 
> addressed - on list.
> 2. Individual review of stakeholder input.
> 3. Schedule a call to to discuss issues.
> 4. Draft summary/report
>
> Comments?
>
> Alan