Re: [gnso-stability-thickwhois] Kickoff
FYI, this is from the charter: Stability: in the event of a Registrar business or technical failure, it could be beneficial to ICANN and registrants to have the full set of domain registration contact data stored by four organizations (the Registry, the Registry's escrow agent, the Registrar, and the Registrar's escrow agent), which would be the case in a thick¹ registry. With best regards, Marika On 15/01/13 17:03, "Alan Greenberg" <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >I'm not sure it is really an "issue". If I remember correctly, it >came out of the brainstorming of all the possible changes and >implications associated with a thin-to-thick transition. > >I will dig out the charter. > >Alan > >At 15/01/2013 10:44 AM, Neuman, Jeff wrote: >>Sounds like a reasonable plan. Can someone just forward around the >>relevant section(s) of the charter that deal with this issue as a >>starting point? I cannot recall as to why stability was even an issue. >> >>Jeffrey J. Neuman >>Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx >>[mailto:owner-gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carolyn >>Hoover >>Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:40 AM >>To: Alan Greenberg; gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx >>Subject: RE: [gnso-stability-thickwhois] Kickoff >> >> >>Sounds like a reasonable plan. I don't have the WG calendar >>handy. Are there dates we need to hit for each of these steps to be >>in alignment with that calendar? >> >>Carolyn >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx >>[mailto:owner-gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan >>Greenberg >>Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 9:56 AM >>To: gnso-stability-thickwhois@xxxxxxxxx >>Subject: [gnso-stability-thickwhois] Kickoff >> >> >>I am afraid that I have had to focus on other issues until now, but >>given that stakeholder input is just now arriving, this is probably >>a good time to start work in earnest. >> >>The members of this sub-group are: >>* Alan Greenberg (ALAC) >>* Carolyn Hoover (RySG) >>* Tim Ruiz (RrSG) >>* Jeff Neuman (RySG) >>* Christopher E George (IPC) >>* Frederic Guillemaut (RrSG) >> >>As I understand it, we are looking at two issues: >> >>- Stability, with a focus on the implications and requirements of >>having multiple repositories of Whois data. >>- Data Escrow document what is done and investigate if any changes >>are required or recommended. >> >>I suggest the following for our work-plan: >> >>1. Discussion and enhancement (if applicable) of topics to be >>addressed - on list. >>2. Individual review of stakeholder input. >>3. Schedule a call to to discuss issues. >>4. Draft summary/report >> >>Comments? >> >>Alan > Attachment:
smime.p7s
|