ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-stakeholder-charters]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

ICANN Injustices wrt Stakeholder Group Charters

  • To: gnso-stakeholder-charters@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: ICANN Injustices wrt Stakeholder Group Charters
  • From: Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:16:24 -0700

<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; 
-webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
<div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; 
margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 
14px; ">RE: ICANN Stakeholder Group Charter Injustices</div><div 
style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; 
"><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 
14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">Dear 
ICANN:</font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 
0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; 
min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; 
min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px 
Helvetica">IP Justice appreciates this opportunity to provide public comment.  
Founded in 2002, IP Justice is an international civil liberties organization 
that works on intellectual property and Internet law and policy issues.  IP 
Justice is a noncommercial 501(c)(3) public benefit organization based in San 
Francisco with an international board of directors and members in countries 
from all corners of the globe (<a 
href="http://www.ipjustice.org";>http://www.ipjustice.org</a>).  IP Justice 
participates in the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) as a member of 
the Noncommercial Users Constituency (NCUC).</font></p><div style="margin-top: 
0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal 
normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><div 
style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px; "><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">ICANN 
Cannot Ignore the Consensus Charter Created by Noncommercial Users in a 
Bottom-Up Process</font></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; 
margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal 
Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 
0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px 
Helvetica">IP Justice is writing to express our deep disappointment with the 
unjust manner in which previous public comment (period ending 15 April 2009) 
was discarded by ICANN in the reformulation of the proposed Noncommercial 
Stakeholder Group Charter [1]. </font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; 
margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal 
normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 
0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" 
style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">NCUC undertook months of consultations with a 
diverse range of parties in the creation of its draft charter [2] proposed for 
a Noncommercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG).  NCUC participated in an extended 
consensus process that involved global civil society, ICANN board, staff, 
members of the At-Large community, and other noncommercial actors in the 
creation of the charter submitted by NCUC in March 2009. </font></p><div 
style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; 
"><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 
14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">Civil 
society’s NCSG charter was explicitly supported by over 80 noncommercial 
organizations and individuals in the April 2009 Public Comment period.  Every 
single noncommercial organization that submitted a comment during the period 
supported NCUC’s charter and asked ICANN not to force noncommercial users into 
constituencies for electing leadership positions (the 
“silo-model”). </font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; 
margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal 
Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 
0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px 
Helvetica">During discussions at the March 2009 ICANN meeting in Mexico, NCUC 
specifically asked ICANN if the NCSG charter it was drafting was inconsistent 
with the report of the ICANN Board Structural Improvements Committee (SIC) and 
NCUC was told its draft charter was not inconsistent. </font></p><div 
style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; 
"><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 
14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">Yet in 
June, without any explanation or regard for democratic or bottom-up processes, 
ICANN staff and Board SIC threw out the consensus charter that civil society 
developed and replaced it with an entirely different model -- the silo-model 
that civil society explicitly said would stranglehold noncommercial users in 
policy development. [3]</font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 
0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 
12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 
0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" 
style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">Why ICANN’s Proposed Silo-Model is Bad for 
Noncommercial Users</font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; 
margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal 
Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 
0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px 
Helvetica">NCUC and civil society made numerous efforts in public statements in 
April to explain why the silo-model of governance being imposed by ICANN harms 
noncommercial interests in the overall GNSO policy process.[4]  Yet these 
concerns remain unanswered by ICANN. </font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; 
margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal 
normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 
0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" 
style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">In particular, ICANN’s attempt to divide the 
GNSO Council and Executive Committee seats among arbitrary (and board-selected) 
constituencies within the NCSG encourages competition among constituencies, 
while an entire stakeholder group wide election (as proposed by civil society) 
encourages consensus building and cooperation between constituencies to elect 
NCSG representatives.  Noncommercial users will be in a constant stranglehold 
with each other, competing for scarce resources and representation, and will 
remain ineffective in the larger GNSO policy negotiations, if the ICANN drafted 
charter is allowed to replace the consensus charter drafted by noncommercial 
users.</font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 
0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; 
min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; 
min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px 
Helvetica">Noncommercial users understand well what we are up against in the 
ICANN policy development arena: full-time highly paid lobbyists from the 
wealthiest industries relentlessly lobby the ICANN Board and staff for 
preferential advantages for their companies.  Noncommercial users understand 
that if we are to have any chance of influencing ICANN policy it can only 
happen when we join together and are able to work cooperatively toward our 
shared objectives.  This can be accomplished by stakeholder group wide 
elections, which encourage candidates to reach beyond their own constituency 
for support.  But the charter drafted by ICANN to keep noncommercial users 
accountable only to their own focused constituency, rather than the entire 
stakeholder group, will render all noncommercial interests dead on arrival in 
the new GNSO.  That is exactly what the commercial constituencies want and why 
they lobbied the board to change the NCSG charter to benefit commercial 
participants.  (Remember the commercial representatives are still angry that 
noncommercial users are supposed to be given parity to commercial actors on the 
GNSO Council, and this is one way of keeping noncommercial users less effective 
on the council).</font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; 
margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal 
Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 
0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px 
Helvetica">ICANN's attempt to impose a top-down governance structure on 
noncommercial users against our will calls into question ICANN's legitimacy to 
govern; it undermines confidence in ICANN's commitment to democratic values; 
and it appears ICANN is unable or unwilling to protect the broader public 
interest against commercial pressures.</font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; 
margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal 
normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 
0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" 
style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">Now ICANN should listen to noncommercial users 
and finally respect our democratic wishes regarding a governance structure that 
advances noncommercial interests.  Thus ICANN should seriously reconsider its 
attempt to impose a controlling top-down charter on noncommercial users against 
their expressed will.</font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; 
margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal 
Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 
0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px 
Helvetica">Board Gives Commercial Constituencies a VETO Over Any Board Decision 
to Permit Future Constituencies</font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; 
margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal 
normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 
0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" 
style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">Amazingly, the Commercial Stakeholder Group 
Charter[5] that was drafted by the 3 existing commercial constituencies and 
which gives each of those 3 constituencies a VETO over any board vote creating 
a new commercial constituency to be represented on the GNSO Council was 
rubber-stamped for approval by the ICANN Board SIC. </font></p><div 
style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; 
"><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 
14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">In 
particular see ICANN’s proposed Commercial Stakeholder Group 
Charter:</font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; 
margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal 
Helvetica; min-height: 14px; ">"4.2. Membership shall also be open to any 
additional constituency recognised by ICANN’s Board under its by-laws, provided 
that such constituency, as determined by the unanimous consent of the 
signatories to this charter, is representative of commercial user interests 
which for the purposes of definition are distinct from and exclude registry and 
prospective registry, registrar, re-seller or other domain name supplier 
interests." (italics added)</div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 
0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 
12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 
0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" 
style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">If commercial constituencies can veto a decision 
by the Board of Directors, who is running ICANN?</font></p><div 
style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; 
"><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 
14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">How will 
giving existing participants a veto to block new participants on the GNSO 
Council encourage new commercial entrants?  If adopted, the CSG charter will 
ensure that no new commercial perspectives are allowed to take hold in the CSG 
– only the 3 existing constituencies can hold all power in the future under the 
CSG charter. </font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; 
margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal 
Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><div style="margin-top: 0px; 
margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal 
normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; ">Treatment of Stakeholder 
Group Charters Shows ICANN Unaccountable to Public Interest</div><div 
style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; 
"><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 
14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">Why did 
ICANN take all decision making authority away from the noncommercial users, but 
give total decision making authority (+ veto power) to commercial participants 
in the draft charters?</font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 
0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 
12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 
0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" 
style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">The difference in treatment by ICANN between 
commercial and noncommercial users in the charters is astounding -- but points 
solidly to one of ICANN’s biggest flaws: its subordination of the public 
interest to select commercial interests engaged in 
insider-lobbying. </font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; 
margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal 
Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 
0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px 
Helvetica">Fixing the SG charters to hold ICANN accountable to the public 
interest and Internet users (instead of only commercial lobbyists) would be a 
good start to addressing the pervasive lack of confidence in ICANN’s ability to 
govern fairly.</font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; 
margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal 
Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 
0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px 
Helvetica">Respectfully submitted,</font></p><div style="margin-top: 0px; 
margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal 
normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><br></div><p style="margin: 
0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" 
style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">Robin D. Gross</font></p><div style="margin-top: 
0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal 
normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; ">Executive 
Director</div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 
0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; 
min-height: 14px; ">IP Justice</div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 
0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 
12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; "><a 
href="http://www.ipjustice.org";>http://www.ipjustice.org</a></div><div 
style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; 
"><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 
14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">“Is 
ICANN Accountable to the Global Public Interest?” see: <a 
href="http://bit.ly/34tmz";>http://bit.ly/34tmz</a></font></p><div 
style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; 
">--------</div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 
0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; 
min-height: 14px; ">Notes:</div><div style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; 
margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal 
Helvetica; min-height: 14px; ">[1] Public Comments Filed in Comment Period 
Ending 15 April 2009 on Stakeholder Group Charters: <a 
href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/sg-petitions-charters/";>http://forum.icann.org/lists/sg-petitions-charters/</a>
 see also “Is ICANN Accountable to the Global Public Interest?” at <a 
href="http://ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCSG/NCUC-ICANN-Injustices.html";>http://ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCSG/NCUC-ICANN-Injustices.html</a></div><div
 style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; 
"><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 
14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">[2]  
Consensus charter for noncommercial users developed by civil society and 
submitted by NCUC: <a 
href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/ncsg-petition-charter.pdf";>http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/ncsg-petition-charter.pdf</a>
 and its Executive Summary: <a 
href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/executive-summary-ncsg-proposal.pdf";>http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/executive-summary-ncsg-proposal.pdf</a></font></p><div
 style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; 
"><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 
14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">[3] 
ICANN drafted NCSG Charter: <a 
href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/ncsg-proposed-petition-charter-22jun09.pdf";>http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/ncsg-proposed-petition-charter-22jun09.pdf</a>
 and its intended “mystery” Section 5 at: <a 
href="http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCSG/Council_Seat_Vacancies_Section_%285.0%29_DRAFT-1.pdf";>http://www.ipjustice.org/ICANN/NCSG/Council_Seat_Vacancies_Section_%285.0%29_DRAFT-1.pdf</a></font></p><div
 style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; 
"><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 
14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">[4] For 
example, see Comment by Adam Peake at <a 
href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/sg-petitions-charters/msg00013.html";>http://forum.icann.org/lists/sg-petitions-charters/msg00013.html</a>;
 Joint Civil Society Statement at <a 
href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/sg-petitions-charters/msg00019.html";>http://forum.icann.org/lists/sg-petitions-charters/msg00019.html</a>;
 Comment from Milton Mueller at <a 
href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/sg-petitions-charters/msg00011.html";>http://forum.icann.org/lists/sg-petitions-charters/msg00011.html</a>;
 Comment from WSIS Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus at <a 
href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/sg-petitions-charters/msg00009.html";>http://forum.icann.org/lists/sg-petitions-charters/msg00009.html</a>
 for just a sampling of the many comments making this point.</font></p><div 
style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 
0px; font: normal normal normal 12px/normal Helvetica; min-height: 14px; 
"><br></div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; min-height: 
14.0px"><font face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">[5] 
Proposed Commercial Stakeholder Group Charter (drafted by existing 
constituencies and rubber-stamped by ICANN posted to: <a 
href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/csg-proposed-petition-charter-22jun09.pdf";>http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/csg-proposed-petition-charter-22jun09.pdf</a>. </font></p><div><br></div><br>
 <span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 
0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; 
font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: 
normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; 
white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; 
-webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; 
-webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; 
-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0; "><div><span></span></div></span></body></html>

Attachment: ipjustice-statement-charter-injustices.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; 
-webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><span class="Apple-style-span" 
style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; 
font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; 
letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; 
text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; 
word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; 
-webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; 
-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0; 
"><div><span></span></div></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" 
style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; 
font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; 
letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: auto; 
text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; 
word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; 
-webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; 
-webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0; "><div><br 
class="khtml-block-placeholder"></div><div><br></div><div>IP 
JUSTICE</div><div>Robin Gross, Executive Director</div><div>1192 Haight Street, 
San Francisco, CA  94117  USA</div><div>p: +1-415-553-6261    f: 
+1-415-462-6451</div><div>w: <a 
href="http://www.ipjustice.org";>http://www.ipjustice.org</a>     e: <a 
href="mailto:robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx</a></div><br 
class="Apple-interchange-newline"></span><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"> 
</div><br></body></html>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy