We strongly object this 4.2 close.

["Alexei Sozonov" <sozonov@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear ICANN representatives,

We strongly object 4.2 close:

"-4.2 Membership shall also be open to any additional constituency
recognised by ICANN’s Board under its by-laws, provided that such
constituency, as determined by the unanimous consent of the signatories
to this charter, is representative of commercial user interests which
for the purposes of definition are distinct from and exclude registry
and* prospective registry, registrar, re-seller or other domain name
supplier interests.*"

In a view of existing conflicts of interests in the existing constituencies 
it's not fare to let them block new members in a view of  suspect others in 
* prospective registry, registrar, re-seller or other domain name
supplier interests.* It's clearly block\prevent almost every member of  new 
constituency on the proposed grounds.
This proposal doesn't reflect given statement of "treating others with 
dignity, respect, courtesy, and civility; listening attentively and seeking 
to and understand others; acting with honesty, sincerity, and integrity; and 
maintaining community good standing".
Respectfully,

Alex Sozonov