RE: [gnso-sti] Common Grounds Paper

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Zahid for this effort.  Just to clarify, are these statements of
common ground with the actual stakeholder groups/constituencies or just
common ground with the reps on the STI group from the stakeholder
groups/constituencies?  At least with respect to the RySG, although I
can certainly express my own opinion, at this point in time, I cannot
state whether those opinions constitute the opinions of the RySG.  I am
hopeful I can adequately represent them, but I just wanted to note that
for the record.


Thanks.

 

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy



________________________________

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for
the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential
and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you
have received this e-mail message in error and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately and delete the original message.

 

 

From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Zahid Jamil
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 11:23 AM
To: gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Margie Milam'
Subject: [gnso-sti] Common Grounds Paper

 

Dear All,

 

With great appreciation for many of those who took part in many hours of
off-line discussions and work to try and reach some common ground in
anticipation of the calls this week, this Table has been prepared which
outlines the areas where various parties 'seem' to agree.  

 

I have not had a chance to discuss these with Ry, Rar or IPC.  This
document only represents much common ground being attempted to be
reached between NCSG, ALAC and BC positions based on initial
discussions.  The document only represents initial thinking as to ideas
for reaching common ground and does not attempt to crystallize positions
and has been prepared just to start discussions.

 

Since some of us who have been working on the document in various time
zones over long hours, please allow room for a few errors and feel free
to point out corrections - apologies in advance. 

 

Hope this helps to drive discussion over the coming weeks.

 

 

 

Sincerely,

 

Zahid Jamil

Barrister-at-law

Jamil & Jamil

Barristers-at-law

219-221 Central Hotel Annexe

Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan

Cell: +923008238230

Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025

Fax: +92 21 5655026

www.jamilandjamil.com <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> 

 

Notice / Disclaimer

This message contains confidential information and its contents are
being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the
intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
e-mail.  Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have
received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The
contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil &
Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute privileged information
protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication,
use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts
(including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means
whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this
communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil &
Jamil is prohibited.