RE: [gnso-sti] Common Grounds Paper

["Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Jeff et all,
 
Just to clarify in regards the Common Grounds Paper:
 
I anticipate that every constituency/SG will be coming up with their
individual positions and comments which will be sent to the GNSO.  The CG
Paper does not represent constituencies/groups formal/approved positions.
However, the CG Paper is an effort of reps on the STI and many in their
constituency/group to see where depending on quid pro quo there may be
possibilities to achieve common ground.  This does not prejudice or impact
constituency/group positions.  As mentioned earlier the document does not
represent crystallized views and ideas and positions of
constituencies/groups may be subject to change depending on how the process
moves forward and possible compromises may have to be made by any in
attempting to reach consensus.  However, if the STI process fails in whole
or in part to achieve consensus the document will not prejudice any
positions of each constituency/group nor those positions that may be sent by
each constituency/group to the GNSO.  So it's just something for us to help
in our discussions.
 
 
Sincerely,
 
Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
 <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> www.jamilandjamil.com
 
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law,
and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client
privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of
any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing
it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or
incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written
permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.
 
From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 10:15 PM
To: Zahid Jamil; gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Margie Milam
Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] Common Grounds Paper
 
Thanks Zahid for this effort.  Just to clarify, are these statements of
common ground with the actual stakeholder groups/constituencies or just
common ground with the reps on the STI group from the stakeholder
groups/constituencies?  At least with respect to the RySG, although I can
certainly express my own opinion, at this point in time, I cannot state
whether those opinions constitute the opinions of the RySG.  I am hopeful I
can adequately represent them, but I just wanted to note that for the
record.

Thanks.
 
Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
  _____  

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
delete the original message.
 
 
From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Zahid Jamil
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 11:23 AM
To: gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Margie Milam'
Subject: [gnso-sti] Common Grounds Paper
 
Dear All,
 
With great appreciation for many of those who took part in many hours of
off-line discussions and work to try and reach some common ground in
anticipation of the calls this week, this Table has been prepared which
outlines the areas where various parties 'seem' to agree.  
 
I have not had a chance to discuss these with Ry, Rar or IPC.  This document
only represents much common ground being attempted to be reached between
NCSG, ALAC and BC positions based on initial discussions.  The document only
represents initial thinking as to ideas for reaching common ground and does
not attempt to crystallize positions and has been prepared just to start
discussions.
 
Since some of us who have been working on the document in various time zones
over long hours, please allow room for a few errors and feel free to point
out corrections - apologies in advance. 
 
Hope this helps to drive discussion over the coming weeks.
 
 
 
Sincerely,
 
Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
 <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> www.jamilandjamil.com
 
Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law,
and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client
privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of
any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing
it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or
incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written
permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.