<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-sti] Draft STI Report
- To: "Margie Milam" <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO STI'" <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-sti] Draft STI Report
- From: "Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond" <ocl@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 10:32:56 +0100
Thank you for this, Margie. Just a quick note, at first glance: you define
"rough consensus" but use the term "broad consensus" in the table. Is this the
same? Which one did we all prefer?
Warm regards,
Olivier
----- Original Message -----
From: Margie Milam
To: 'GNSO STI'
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 5:46 AM
Subject: [gnso-sti] Draft STI Report
Dear All,
Attached for your review is the first draft of the STI Report, that includes
only the Trademark Clearinghouse recommendations. I will send the remainder
of the document with the URS descriptions this weekend.
Best Regards,
Margie
_____________
Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_____________
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|