ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-sti] Draft STI Report

  • To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>, "'GNSO STI'" <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] Draft STI Report
  • From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 13:45:51 -0800

Hi Olivier
Sorry, I didn't mean to create a new category.   Rough consensus should = broad 
consensus---  I'll make those changes.
All the Best,

From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond [mailto:ocl@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 2:33 AM
To: Margie Milam; 'GNSO STI'
Subject: Re: [gnso-sti] Draft STI Report

Thank you for this, Margie. Just a quick note, at first glance: you define 
"rough consensus" but use the term "broad consensus" in the table. Is this the 
same? Which one did we all prefer?
Warm regards,
----- Original Message -----
From: Margie Milam<mailto:Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
To: 'GNSO STI'<mailto:gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 5:46 AM
Subject: [gnso-sti] Draft STI Report

Dear All,

Attached for your review is the first draft of the STI Report, that includes 
only the Trademark Clearinghouse recommendations.   I will send the remainder 
of the document with the URS descriptions this weekend.

Best Regards,



Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy