RE: [gnso-sti] The S in STI and ALAC minority position
- To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, gnso sti <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] The S in STI and ALAC minority position
- From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 07:52:59 -0800
Please let me know if there are any other updates to the minority positions in
the STI Report. I will be including the Business Constituency report sent out
by Mike Rodenbaugh last week, as well as Alan's update below.
Senior Policy Counselor
From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 1:54 AM
To: gnso sti
Subject: [gnso-sti] The S in STI and ALAC minority position
The S seems to take on new meanings in every document.
The GNSO motion used Selected
The report uses Special
The BC uses Specific
Perhaps we can converge on SPLENDID!
The ALAC will be voting on our minority position over the next three
days. There will only be three, so please remove the notation of one
on URS 2.1. I will forward a copy later on Monday.