ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-sti]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-sti] The S in STI and ALAC minority position

  • To: gnso sti <gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-sti] The S in STI and ALAC minority position
  • From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:41:46 -0500

Attached is the ALAC minority position in both WORD and PDF formats.

Support for the report and the minority statement is being voted on now and we will have the results by the time of the GNSO meeting this week.

Alan

At 14/12/2009 10:52 AM, Margie Milam wrote:
Dear All,

Please let me know if there are any other updates to the minority positions in the STI Report. I will be including the Business Constituency report sent out by Mike Rodenbaugh last week, as well as Alan's update below.


Best Regards,

Margie

_____________

Margie Milam
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN
_____________


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-sti@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 1:54 AM
To: gnso sti
Subject: [gnso-sti] The S in STI and ALAC minority position


The S seems to take on new meanings in every document.

The GNSO motion used Selected
The report uses Special
The BC uses Specific

Perhaps we can converge on SPLENDID!

The ALAC will be voting on our minority position over the next three
days. There will only be three, so please remove the notation of one
on URS 2.1. I will forward a copy later on Monday.

Thanks, Alan

Attachment: ALAC-MinorityReport.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF Document

Attachment: ALAC-MinorityReport.doc
Description:



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy