<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-thickwhois-dt] MP3 / Thick WHOIS PDP Drafting Team - recording 20 September 2012 at 18:00 UTC
- To: Thick WHOIS PDP DT <Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] MP3 / Thick WHOIS PDP Drafting Team - recording 20 September 2012 at 18:00 UTC
- From: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:15:48 -0700
Dear All,
The next Thick WHOIS PDP Drafting Team call is scheduled on Thursday 27
September 2012 at 1800 UTC.
Please find the MP3 recording of the Thick WHOIS PDP Drafting Team
teleconference held on Thursday 20 September 2012 at 1800 UTC at:
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-thick-whois-20120920-en.mp3
On page:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/calendar/#sep<http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#aug>
The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master
Calendar page:
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/
Attendees
Elisa Cooper - CBUC
Keith Drazek - RySG
Ray Fassett - RySG
Susan Kawaguchi - CBUC
Mikey O'Connor - ISPCP
Evan Leibovitch - At-Large
Caroline Hoover - RySG
Alan Greenberg - At-Large
Jeff Neumann - RySG
Ekaterina Dureva - individual
ICANN Staff
Marika Konings
Berry Cobb
Barbara Roseman
Nathalie Peregrine
Apology:
Frédéric Guillemaut - RrSG
Susan Prosser - RrSG
Steve Metalitz - IPC
Avri Doria - NCSG
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Nathalie
Mailing list archives:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-thickwhois-dt/
Wiki page:
https://community.icann.org/x/whgQAg
Information on WHOIS can be found on page
http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/thick-whois.htm
Participants subscribed to the drafting team
Wilson Abigaba - NCUC
Bob Bruen - NARALO ALS
Elisa Cooper - CBUC
Avri Doria - NCSG
Keith Drazek - RySG
Ekaterina Dureva - Individual
Ray Fassett - RySG
Alan Greenberg - At-Large
Volker Greimann - RrSG
Frédéric Guillemaut - RrSG
Tony Harris - ISPCP
Caroline Hoover - RySG
Susan Kawaguchi - CBUC
Evan Leibovitch - At-Large
Steve Metalitz - IPC
Mikey O'Connor - ISPCP
Susan Prosser - RrSG
Tim Ruiz - RrSG
Carlton Samuels - At-Large
Michael Shohat - RrSG
Jonathan Tenenbaum - RrSG
Brian Winterfeldt - IPC
Jonathan Zuck - IPC
Observers
Stephane van Gelder - RrSG
Jeff Neuman - RySG
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben - ISPCP
******
Adobe Connect Chat Transcript:
Marika Konings:Welcome to the 'thick' Whois DT meeting of 20 September 2012
Barb Roseman:barb on call, will be on mute
Marika Konings:Jeff has joined the call now
Marika Konings:Carolyn Hoover has joined the call
Keith Drazek, Verisign:icann has recently used the RSEP as a broad funnel for
processing registry requests for things that are not actually services
Keith Drazek, Verisign:as an fyi
Keith Drazek, Verisign:+1 jeff
Carolyn Hoover (dotCoop, RySG):+1 jeff
Keith Drazek, Verisign:"collect and publish" is good
Barb Roseman:would it help to capitalize Registry when we mean the TLD
registry
Barb Roseman:and lowercase registry, when we mean the set of data
Keith Drazek, Verisign:the registry collects if from the registrars, not the
registrants
Barb Roseman:what are you trying to distinguish here?
Keith Drazek, Verisign:the word "manage" suggests that the registry is doing
more than it actually is. registrars have the management role as it relates to
the registration data because they have the relationship wtih the registrant.
Keith Drazek, Verisign:registries simpley collect (or accept) and publish (or
republish) the data provided by registrars
Marika Konings:Maybe also worth noting that this paragraph is intended as an
introduction to the issue, not necessarily a set in stone definition of thin
vs. thick
Evan Leibovitch:Sorry, called away. Just joined now
Barb Roseman:I got dropped, but that looks like a good change
Barb Roseman:what you are trying to make clear is that there's a difference
between the TLD Registry and the Whois registry
Keith Drazek, Verisign:the whois is the public output from the registry
database
Evan Leibovitch:It seems that in going into detail about who does what ... as
opposed to what is collected and displayed .. this DT is stra
Evan Leibovitch:aying very deep inti the PDP's own work
Jeff Neuman:@evan, I dont think that is the case
Jeff Neuman:We are not applying any judgement here
Jeff Neuman:just reflecting what actually occurs
Keith Drazek, Verisign:evan, i think we're just ensuring the current roles
are accurately described. the question for the WG is whether it's appropriate
for all registries to use one model over the other.
Keith Drazek, Verisign:current models
Evan Leibovitch:One would think, then, that the only deefinitions that matter
(at the current time) are those enumerated in the Agreements. Everything else
is interpretation.
Evan Leibovitch:(including definitions)
Keith Drazek, Verisign:"collected by the registry from the registrar"
Barb Roseman:well, it's been defined many times, but this is consistent with
the other working group definitions
Keith Drazek, Verisign:we're not re-defining anything, we're making sure the
definitions are clear and accurate based on how the process works in reality
today
Evan Leibovitch:Sorry Mikey. I've said my piece, I'm done
Jeff Neuman:All - how long is this call scheduled for?
Elisa Cooper:1 hour, I think
Jeff Neuman:k...I need to drop at 3 anyway
Jeff Neuman:(sorry...meant to say after an hour for those not on my time zone)
Barb Roseman:consisstent of each whois data item, or consistent, meaning all
provide the same data sets
Elisa Cooper:Mikey - dropping off now.
Ray Fassett (.JOBS):ok with me Mikey
Marika Konings:Just wanted to note that the resolution doesn't spell out the
question but refers to 'on the issues defined in the issue report' which
summarizes the question as 'whether 'thick' Whois for all gTLDs should be
required or not'.
Keith Drazek, Verisign:It's inconceivable to me that the WG would reach
consensus that Thick Whois NOT be required for all. There may be dissneting
views in the WG, but a consensus on NOT requiring thick isn't very likely.
Keith Drazek, Verisign:if anything, including this language would actually
encourage the WG in reaching consensus on Thick for all, to prevent the specter
of existing registries going from thick to thin.
Evan Leibovitch:Agree strongly with Alan and Susan. It's a different question
entitrely
Ray Fassett (.JOBS):fair point to me jeff
Evan Leibovitch:It's not an issie of fairness. It's a matter of this PDP
answering this specific question.
Keith Drazek, Verisign:if there's consensus about anything, it'll become a
consensus policy and then should/would apply to everyone, right?
Ray Fassett (.JOBS):thanks Mikey
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|