<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] Final Charter
- To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx DT" <Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] Final Charter
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 22:29:55 -0400
At 09/10/2012 10:18 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
Hi,
Never occurred to me to consider it an obfuscation., What did I miss?
Wasn't implying deliberate, just whether it was overly confusing.
Does seem like a hard work item to understand.
Are they supposed to determine the truth value of the statement?
I think the WG is supposed to evaluate whether it is indeed
beneficial. It is somewhat linked to the second-to-last bullet on
whether a Registrar escrow program is still needed.
Alan
In any case, thanks. I will pas the questions on to the NCSG
g-council members.
avri
On 9 Oct 2012, at 22:02, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>
> I read the question as being in relation to the statement "it
COULD be beneficial" - is it rally beneficial or not?
>
> The previous bullet on response consistency is phrased the same
way - no question mark but an implied question by not saying it
WOULD be beneficial.
>
> Perhaps not the clearest possible formulation, but I don't see is
as obfuscation either, so I can live with it.
>
> Alan
>
> At 09/10/2012 09:43 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Apologies for missing the meeting - just read the email now
about the meeting (wish we have a importable calendar of all WG and
DT meetings like AT-Large does).
>>
>> In an case, read the final proposal and I have a question. If
it is too late for them in this DT, then I will ask a NCSG
g-council member to ask.
>>
>> In the second bullet of the Mission, "-stability': is there a
question in that? It seems rather declarative and I was wondering
if it contained any element of a work item or is it just a
declaration of 'fact'
>>
>> Otherwise it seems fine.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8 Oct 2012, at 15:08, Marika Konings wrote:
>>
>> > Dear All,
>> >
>> > For your information, please find attached the final version
of the proposed charter which will be submitted to the GNSO Council
as per the DT's meeting today.
>> >
>> > With best regards,
>> >
>> > Marika
>> > <Thick Whois Charter - Final - 8 October 2012.doc>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|