<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-thickwhois-dt] a modest amendment to our charter point on "privacy and data protection"
- To: "Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx DT" <Gnso-thickwhois-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] a modest amendment to our charter point on "privacy and data protection"
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:32:50 -0400
hi all,
Avri wasn't able to make the last-minute-Monday call to hammer on this last
remaining issue. she and i visited a bit about this yesterday and came up with
the following amendment to one of our bullets.
i view this as a friendly amendment in that is does a better job of defining
the "container" for the "rights" discussion in our charter. yes, it's a bit
broader, but i don't think it's *that* much broader and it does a good job of
clarifying the issue i was trying to push us through too quickly on the last
"normal" call.
sorry about the late-breaking news. i'd be really interested to hear from
people who have a violent reaction. as i said, i think this a modest and
helpful clarification of the charter topic.
mikey
Current language:
Impact on privacy and data protection: how would ‘thick’ Whois affect privacy
and data protection, also taking into account the involvement of different
jurisdictions with different laws and legislation with regard to data privacy
as well as possible cross border transfers of registrant data?
Proposed language:
Impact on rights: how would ‘thick’ Whois affect rights such as Privacy,
Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Association as well as adherence to data
protection regulations, taking into account the involvement of different
jurisdictions with different laws and legislation with regard to data privacy
as well as possible cross border transfers of registrant data?
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP
(ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|