Re: [gnso-thickwhois-dt] a modest amendment to our charter point on "privacy and data protection"
The feedback I am getting from the ALAC is that the suggested change is not supported, a position that I support. Alan At 13/10/2012 11:32 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote: hi all,Avri wasn't able to make the last-minute-Monday call to hammer on this last remaining issue. she and i visited a bit about this yesterday and came up with the following amendment to one of our bullets.i view this as a friendly amendment in that is does a better job of defining the "container" for the "rights" discussion in our charter. yes, it's a bit broader, but i don't think it's *that* much broader and it does a good job of clarifying the issue i was trying to push us through too quickly on the last "normal" call.sorry about the late-breaking news. i'd be really interested to hear from people who have a violent reaction. as i said, i think this a modest and helpful clarification of the charter topic.mikey Current language:Impact on privacy and data protection: how would 'thick' Whois affect privacy and data protection, also taking into account the involvement of different jurisdictions with different laws and legislation with regard to data privacy as well as possible cross border transfers of registrant data?Proposed language:Impact on rights: how would 'thick' Whois affect rights such as Privacy, Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Association as well as adherence to data protection regulations, taking into account the involvement of different jurisdictions with different laws and legislation with regard to data privacy as well as possible cross border transfers of registrant data?PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: <http://www.haven2.com>www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
|