Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] version 2 of the drawing

[Rick Wesson <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

please stop with the pictures, your second image is equally
ill-informed. please, please stop leading us to the weeds and direct
us to the greens. I so need this conversation to find the fare-way,
but all I see is forest.

first remove all out of scope issues, don't shade them. the delete
your image makeing software.

as chair of the working group your duty is to help us locate
consensus, not divide and frustrate us to the point of surrender.

-rick

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hi all,
>
> thanks for all the hammering (er, feedback).  here's another draft to take a
> look at.
>
> Rick, i'm sortof being purposeful in my use of terms.  the point of this
> exercise, at least for me, is to get a handle on the difference between what
> is inside and outside our scope.  the one exception is the "authoritative"
> point -- we had a long conversation about that in the drafting-team and
> realized that there are at least two definitions of "authoritative" that we
> need to take a look at.  here's the relevant snippet from the charter:
>
> The Working Group should consider the term "authoritative" in both the
> technical (the repository of the authoritative data) and policy (who has
> authority over the data) meanings of the word when considering this issue.
>
>
> Alan is correct to twig me about my flippant use of that term.  i've
> sprinkled it a few more places, with question marks, to acknowledge that.
>
> i think the biggest change i've made to this drawing is to highlight the
> scope boundary between what we're charged with looking at, and the rest.
>
> see what you think.  off to lunch, followed by a nap.  i await further
> refinements.  :-)
>
> mikey
>
>
>
>
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE:
> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
>
>