Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] new pictures

[Rick Wesson <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Systems Boundaries seems reasonable, the others are rubbish. We should stay
focused -- your images don't help constrain our discussion to facts and
observations directed by our charter. I've included a chart to help guide
your thoughts, please consider it.

-rick

        +----------------------+
        |                      |
        |   Recomend Thick     |
        |     Whois            |
        +----------------------+
             +          +
             |          |
             |          |
     +-----+ |          |
     | No  |<+          |
     +--+--+            |
        |               |
        |               v
        |          +---------------+
        |          |   YES         |
        |          |               |
        |          |               |
        |          +------+--------+
        |                 |
        |                 v
        |     +------------------+
        |     |                  |
        +---->|     Why?         |
              |                  |
              |                  |
              +------------------+


On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hi all,
>
> Avri and i had a great conversation this week over, dare i say it, a
series
> of pictures.  the version we arrived at is included in this deck, along
with
> another one that Berry Cobb created for the RAP working group that shows
the
> various contracts between parties in the process.
>
> as with all pictures, this is still a work in progress and i'm sure it
will
> morph a few more times before we're done.  let me lay down a few
> disclaimers.
>
> -- these aren't a representation of WG positions.  the one that Avri and i
> were working on was just a vehicle for a useful (at least for me)
> conversation. it's not even representative of *our* positions.  think of
it
> as more a thought exercise and question-raiser.
>
> -- all the good ideas are Avri's, all the bad ideas are mine.
>
> -- there are assertion/questions in there that we didn't know the answers
> to.  we made them during our conversation but mostly we're interested in
the
> views of others who have more expertise.
>
> -- Berry's drawing about contracts has been reviewed by ICANN legal, so
> there's more meat there -- although it's aimed at a slightly different
> target than ours and thus privacy/proxy providers aren't represented.  it
> would be interesting to see where they fit.
>
> enjoy,
>
> mikey
>
>
>
>
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE:
> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
>
>