Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Re: Proposed agenda - Thick Whois WG meeting

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Presuming the draft report with staff comments is 
archived somewhere, one could submit a public 
comment pointing to that report.  A lot easier 
than extracting the comments.  Alan
At 19/08/2013 03:21 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> i may have muddied the waters here.  i can't 
> remember if i asked that those staff comments be 
> submitted as a public comment, or that they just 
> get forwarded to the working group and 
> incorporated into this round of discussion 
> directly.  with perfect 20/20 hindsight, i wish 
> i'd been clearer that those staff comments be 
> submitted as a public comment -- so that other 
> commenters could have seen them and reacted to them.
> mikey
>
> On Aug 19, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Marika Konings 
> <<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > Almost all of these come from the marked up 
> > version that I shared with the WG prior to 
> > finalizing the Initial Report. It was decided 
> > at the time to consider these together with the 
> > comments received on the Initial Report and 
> > these were added to the 'bucket list'. I am 
> > happy to share the original document again if that would be helpful.
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Marika
> >
> > On 19 Aug 2013, at 18:55, "Metalitz, Steven" 
> > <<mailto:met@xxxxxxx>met@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Marika,
> > >
> > > In your chart there are several references to 
> > > ICANN Staff comments.  These comments do not 
> > > appear in the public comment forum. 
> > > <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-thick-whois-initial-21jun13/>http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-thick-whois-initial-21jun13/ 
> > > Shouldn’t they?  Otherwise it will be 
> > > difficult for anyone to understand and 
> > > evaluate our response to them.  There is also 
> > > a transparency concern if the staff comments 
> > > “privately” and these are treated the same as public comments.
> > > Steve
> > >
> > > From: 
> > > <mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> > > [mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
> > > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 12:18 PM
> > > To: <mailto:gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Proposed agenda - Thick Whois WG meeting
> > >
> > > Dear All,
> > >
> > > Please find below the proposed agenda for the 
> > > next Thick Whois WG Meeting (Tuesday 20 August 
> > > at 14.00 UTC). Note that I've made a small 
> > > addition to comment #14 based on feedback received from a colleague.
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Marika
> > >
> > > Proposed Agenda – Thick Whois WG Meeting on 20 August at 14.00 UTC
> > >    * Roll Call / SOI
> > >    * Continue review of public comments 
> > > received – see public comment review tool attached
> > >    * Confirm next steps & next meeting
>
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: 
> <http://www.haven2.com>www.haven2.com, HANDLE: 
> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)