Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Re: Proposed agenda - Thick Whois WG meeting

[Marie-laure Lemineur <mllemineur@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear all, 

Apologies but I won' t be able to attend the call today. 

Kind regards, 

Marie-laure



Sent from my iPad

On 19/08/2013, at 13:41, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Presuming the draft report with staff comments is archived somewhere, one 
> could submit a public comment pointing to that report.  A lot easier than 
> extracting the comments.  Alan
> 
> At 19/08/2013 03:21 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>> i may have muddied the waters here.  i can't remember if i asked that those 
>> staff comments be submitted as a public comment, or that they just get 
>> forwarded to the working group and incorporated into this round of 
>> discussion directly.  with perfect 20/20 hindsight, i wish i'd been clearer 
>> that those staff comments be submitted as a public comment -- so that other 
>> commenters could have seen them and reacted to them.
>> 
>> mikey
>> 
>> On Aug 19, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx > 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Steve,
>>> 
>>> Almost all of these come from the marked up version that I shared with the 
>>> WG prior to finalizing the Initial Report. It was decided at the time to 
>>> consider these together with the comments received on the Initial Report 
>>> and these were added to the 'bucket list'. I am happy to share the original 
>>> document again if that would be helpful. 
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> Marika
>>> 
>>> On 19 Aug 2013, at 18:55, "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Marika, 
>>>>  
>>>> In your chart there are several references to ICANN Staff comments.  These 
>>>> comments do not appear in the public comment forum. 
>>>> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-thick-whois-initial-21jun13/   
>>>> Shouldn’t they?  Otherwise it will be difficult for anyone to understand 
>>>> and evaluate our response to them.  There is also a transparency concern 
>>>> if the staff comments “privately” and these are treated the same as public 
>>>> comments. 
>>>>  
>>>> Steve    
>>>>  
>>>> From: owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx [ 
>>>> mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
>>>> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 12:18 PM
>>>> To: gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Proposed agenda - Thick Whois WG meeting
>>>>  
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>  
>>>> Please find below the proposed agenda for the next Thick Whois WG Meeting 
>>>> (Tuesday 20 August at 14.00 UTC). Note that I've made a small addition to 
>>>> comment #14 based on feedback received from a colleague.
>>>>  
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>  
>>>> Marika
>>>>  
>>>> Proposed Agenda – Thick Whois WG Meeting on 20 August at 14.00 UTC
>>>> Roll Call / SOI
>>>> Continue review of public comments received – see public comment review 
>>>> tool attached
>>>> Confirm next steps & next meeting
>> 
>> 
>> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: 
>> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)