RE: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Recommendations for a Thick WHOIS new recommendation

["Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>]

Isn't this already covered by the Board-initiated PDP on Whois that will be 
launched once the EWG issues its final report, and as to which a preliminary 
issues report has already been published?  
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gtld-registration-data-15mar13-en.htm
 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 9:45 AM
To: gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Recommendations for a Thick WHOIS new 
recommendation






Hi,

We have moved a lot of privacy issues into a heap called - 'to be worked on 
later'

I recommend that we include the following recommendation to deal with this 
myriad  of issues:

We recommend that the ICANN Board request a GNSO issues report to cover the 
issue of Privacy as related to WHOIS and other GNSO policies.

This recommendation would probably require some glue language in a few other 
spots in the final report.

The reason for requesting that the Board, as opposed to the GNSO, is the number 
of ICANN staff organizations, such as legal, that need to be folded into any 
such effort.  It would also give evidence of ICANN's concern about such issues 
in this time of great privacy anxiety.

thanks


Avri Doria