RE: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Recommendations for a Thick WHOIS new recommendation

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

There is also ANOTHER PDP that is about to be kicked off (Issue 
report came out in December 2011 I think) that was triggered to start 
once the new RAA was approved and was supposed to cover "all of the 
other things raised by the post 2009 RAA WG, and I think that privacy 
was in that laundry list (but am not sure).
Alan

At 03/09/2013 10:03 AM, Metalitz, Steven wrote:

> Isn't this already covered by the Board-initiated PDP on Whois that 
> will be launched once the EWG issues its final report, and as to 
> which a preliminary issues report has already been 
> published? 
> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gtld-registration-data-15mar13-en.htm 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 9:45 AM
> To: gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Recommendations for a Thick WHOIS 
> new recommendation
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We have moved a lot of privacy issues into a heap called - 'to be 
> worked on later'
> I recommend that we include the following recommendation to deal 
> with this myriad  of issues:
> We recommend that the ICANN Board request a GNSO issues report to 
> cover the issue of Privacy as related to WHOIS and other GNSO policies.
> This recommendation would probably require some glue language in a 
> few other spots in the final report.
> The reason for requesting that the Board, as opposed to the GNSO, is 
> the number of ICANN staff organizations, such as legal, that need to 
> be folded into any such effort.  It would also give evidence of 
> ICANN's concern about such issues in this time of great privacy anxiety.
> thanks
>
>
> Avri Doria