[gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Recommendations for a Thick WHOIS new recommendation
Forwarding on behalf of Amr as he is having issues posting to the list (we are looking into this). Begin forwarded message: > From: Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Recommendations for a Thick WHOIS new > recommendation > Date: September 5, 2013 2:41:28 PM GMT+02:00 > To: gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx > > This email doesn't seem to have gotten through. Second attempt. > > On Sep 5, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi Steve, >> >> The issue report posted at the link you provided does indeed mandate the >> ensuing PDP WG to consider both the ongoing progress of any WHOIS-related >> Working Groups, and answer any questions pertaining to privacy laws governing >> transfer of personal data. However, as far as I can tell, this all seems to >> be in the context of access to and accuracy of domain name registration data. >> This will create a scope too narrow to include what I believe Avri is >> suggesting, which should probably list these same two items in an issue >> report more specific to the transition of WHOIS from "thin" to "thick". >> >> This seems fitting to me, since we (as per the WG's initial report) lacked >> the capacity to address this issue conclusively. >> >> I appreciate any more thoughts you and others might have on this. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Amr >> >> On Sep 3, 2013, at 4:03 PM, "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >>> Isn't this already covered by the Board-initiated PDP on Whois that will be >>> launched once the EWG issues its final report, and as to which a preliminary >>> issues report has already been published? >>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gtld-registration-data-15mar13-e >>> n.htm >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx >>> [mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 9:45 AM >>> To: gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Recommendations for a Thick WHOIS new >>> recommendation >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We have moved a lot of privacy issues into a heap called - 'to be worked on >>> later' >>> >>> I recommend that we include the following recommendation to deal with this >>> myriad of issues: >>> >>> We recommend that the ICANN Board request a GNSO issues report to cover the >>> issue of Privacy as related to WHOIS and other GNSO policies. >>> >>> This recommendation would probably require some glue language in a few other >>> spots in the final report. >>> >>> The reason for requesting that the Board, as opposed to the GNSO, is the >>> number of ICANN staff organizations, such as legal, that need to be folded >>> into any such effort. It would also give evidence of ICANN's concern about >>> such issues in this time of great privacy anxiety. >>> >>> thanks >>> >>> >>> Avri Doria >>> >>> >> > Attachment:
smime.p7s
|