FW: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Recommendations for a Thick WHOIS new recommendation

[Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org<http://gnso.icann.org/>

From: owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
Sent: jeudi 5 septembre 2013 14:41
To: gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Recommendations for a Thick WHOIS new 
recommendation

This email doesn't seem to have gotten through. Second attempt.

On Sep 5, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Amr Elsadr 
<aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:


Hi Steve,

The issue report posted at the link you provided does indeed mandate the 
ensuing PDP WG to consider both the ongoing progress of any WHOIS-related 
Working Groups, and answer any questions pertaining to privacy laws governing 
transfer of personal data. However, as far as I can tell, this all seems to be 
in the context of access to and accuracy of domain name registration data. This 
will create a scope too narrow to include what I believe Avri is suggesting, 
which should probably list these same two items in an issue report more 
specific to the transition of WHOIS from "thin" to "thick".

This seems fitting to me, since we (as per the WG's initial report) lacked the 
capacity to address this issue conclusively.

I appreciate any more thoughts you and others might have on this.

Thanks.

Amr

On Sep 3, 2013, at 4:03 PM, "Metalitz, Steven" 
<met@xxxxxxx<mailto:met@xxxxxxx>> wrote:



Isn't this already covered by the Board-initiated PDP on Whois that will be 
launched once the EWG issues its final report, and as to which a preliminary 
issues report has already been published?  
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/gtld-registration-data-15mar13-en.htm

-----Original Message-----
From: 
owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
 
[mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>]
 On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 9:45 AM
To: gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Recommendations for a Thick WHOIS new 
recommendation






Hi,

We have moved a lot of privacy issues into a heap called - 'to be worked on 
later'

I recommend that we include the following recommendation to deal with this 
myriad  of issues:

We recommend that the ICANN Board request a GNSO issues report to cover the 
issue of Privacy as related to WHOIS and other GNSO policies.

This recommendation would probably require some glue language in a few other 
spots in the final report.

The reason for requesting that the Board, as opposed to the GNSO, is the number 
of ICANN staff organizations, such as legal, that need to be folded into any 
such effort.  It would also give evidence of ICANN's concern about such issues 
in this time of great privacy anxiety.

thanks


Avri Doria