Re: [Privacy] [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Recommendations for a Thick WHOIS new recommendation

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

To reassure you all, whether an Issue Report is requested by the GNSO
Council or the ICANN Board, we would conduct the preparation and internal
consultations for such an Issue Report in the same manner, meaning that
all relevant departments, including GDD, would be consulted. The same
would apply for all other steps in the PDP.

Best regards,

Marika 

On 07/09/13 21:33, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
>On 7 Sep 2013, at 11:46, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>> Yes an issue report by the GNSO might do as well, but it might not have
>>the same influence over ICANN beyond the GNSO as a Board request for an
>>issues report. 
>
>
>Let me explain this a bit better.
>
>As I understand it, the GDD has been isolated from the GNSO Policy
>process so that there is less community tussle for the managers of the
>gTLD processes.  But having the Board say this GNSO issues report and PDP
>is important and relevant to GDD, Legal and all the non Policy parts of
>ICANN, might give it a chance to include all side of the issue.
>
>And yes, as I said, i might be achieved otherwise, but personally, I am
>not sure how the GDD is accessed by the community other than through
>Board intercession.
>
>avri
>
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature