[gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] canceling the call today

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

hi all

i'm sorry about the really late notice but i'm going to cancel the call today. 
we've got apologies from so many people at the heart of this discussion that i 
think it's best to to wait a week and get more folks on the call. 

Marika can you make sure the list sees this?  i'm not sure this message from my 
phone will het through

sorry


mikey

Sent from my phone (651-647-6109). Please forgive the goofy transliterations it 
does to my terrible typing. 

On Oct 1, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Carolyn Hoover <choover@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I agree that Tim’s statement is a good summary of our discussions on this 
> issue.  I would support this statement along with the other updates 
> concerning the legal review.
>  
> Carolyn 
>  
> From: owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 7:47 PM
> To: Tim Ruiz; marie-laure Lemineur
> Cc: Mike O'Connor; Thick Whois WG
> Subject: Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] slightly amended version of our working 
> draft -- for discussion on the call tomorrow
>  
> Sounds much cleaner to me. Alan
> 
> At 30/09/2013 07:22 PM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> 
> Yeah, I find it a little confusing too. Should we just say, "We recommend 
> that the ICANN Board ensure that privacy issues are adequatley adressed 
> within the Board initiated PDP on gTLD registration data services or in a 
> separate process."
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:10 PM, "marie-laure Lemineur" <mllemineur@xxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear Mike, 
> 
> I find the edits of the last paragraph in both version a little bit confusing 
> at the beginning. Once the changes are accepted  it reads as follows,  
> 3) "We recommend that if the ICANN Board concludes privacy issues will not be 
> adequately addressed within the scope of the Board - initiated PDP on gTLD 
> registration data services , or otherwise be addressed, that the Board, 
> initiate such actions as to ensure that privacy issues are fully and 
> adequately addressed....."
> 
> Am I missing something?
> 
> best,
> 
> Marie-laure
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> hi all,
> 
> Marika and i took a stab at working Alan's suggestions into the draft that 
> we'll be reviewing on the call tomorrow.  here's the result of our effort.
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> 
> 
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: 
> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) 
>