[gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] Revised language for review

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,

Based on our discussions today, please find below the proposed language for
inclusion in the Final Report which includes the edits proposed in the chat
(in bold) in relation to the legal review. Please share your
support/non-support and/or proposed edits with the mailing list.

Thanks,

Marika

The WG recommends that as part of the implementation process a legal review
of law applicable to the transition of data from a thin to thick model that
has not already been considered in the EWG memo is undertaken and due
consideration is given to potential privacy issues that may arise from the
discussions on the transition from thin to thick Whois, including, for
example, guidance on how the long-standing contractual requirement that
registrars give notice to, and obtain consent, from each registrant for uses
of any personally identifiable data submitted by the registrant should apply
to registrations involved in the transition. Should any privacy issues
emerge from these transition discussions that were not anticipated by the WG
and which would require additional policy consideration, the Implementation
Review Team is expected to notify the GNSO Council of these so that
appropriate action can be taken.

The WG recommends that following the adoption of this report and
recommendations by the GNSO Council, the subsequent public comment forum
(prior to Board consideration) as well as the notification by the ICANN
Board to the GAC, specifically request input on any considerations related
to the transition from thin to thick Whois that would need to be taken into
account as part of the implementation process.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature