ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] WHOIS Techincal Requirements Survey WG - Final Report

  • To: "Berry Cobb" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg] WHOIS Techincal Requirements Survey WG - Final Report
  • From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:41:12 -0500

thanks Berry,

i've given that section a quick read and am relieved to find results that don't 
wildly conflict with our recommendations.

mikey


On Oct 21, 2013, at 11:36 AM, "Berry Cobb" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> WG Members,
>  
> At its last meeting, the GNSO Council adopted a resolution on the 
> recommendations outlined in the WHOIS Survey Requirements WG Final Report.  
> One such recommendation is to send the results of the compiled survey to the 
> Thick WHOIS WG for its consideration and deliberations.  The survey was 
> created in response to a staff paper on possible technical requirements for a 
> future WHOIS system.  The survey’s scope was only from a technical 
> perspective and it did not intend to define or suggest the policies or 
> operational rules that should apply.
>  
> I suspect several members of this WG have already seen the WSWG final report, 
> but the notification here is primarily to fulfill the recommendation adopted 
> by the GNSO Council.  Of specific interest to you is Section 4.14 – 
> Requirement 9 – TLDs Operating Thick WHOIS (pages 51-52).  It contains a few 
> questions about the topic of Thick WHOIS.  Keep in mind that these questions 
> were first developed in May of 2012, with several events overtaking the 
> current relevance of survey.  The first question asks participants about 
> standardized tools for migrating from a thin to thick WHOIS, and the second 
> asks about timeframes for performing the migration.
>  
> WSWG Final Report:  
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois/wswg-final-21aug13-en.pdf
> WSWG Page:  
> http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/active/whois-requirements
>  
> It is understood that this WG has submitted its Final Report to the GNSO 
> Council.  I do not suspect that the survey results will influnce your report, 
> but it may be useful as this effort progresses through the Council and the 
> ICANN Board.  Further, the survey results in the WSWG Final Report will also 
> be shared with staff that will be tasked with the implementation of the 
> recommendations for Thick WHOIS, provided that the report is adopted by the 
> GNSO Council / ICANN Board.
>  
> Please let me know if you have any questions reqarding the compiled survey 
> results.
>  
> Thank you.  B
>  
> Berry Cobb
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> 720.839.5735
> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> @berrycobb
>  
>  


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP 
(ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy