<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-trans-pdp] [Fwd: NCUC Intra-Registrar-Transfer Constituency Stmt]
- To: "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-trans-pdp] [Fwd: NCUC Intra-Registrar-Transfer Constituency Stmt]
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:43:27 -0500
Whereas there is some applicability of this statement to the IRTP PDP, it is
not clear that it deals directly with the limited issues of the PDP, i.e., four
reasons for denying a transfer. Not surprisingly, there seems to be confusion
of the IRTP PDP that the Council initiated and the planning work currently
underway about the 19 other IRTP recommendations for which no action has been
taken.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 3:13 AM
To: gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-trans-pdp] [Fwd: NCUC Intra-Registrar-Transfer Constituency Stmt]
Hello Glen,
Attached please find NCUC's constituency statement RE:
Intra-Registrar-Transfer PDP.
Thank you,
Robin
--
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|