Re: [gnso-trans-pdp] Drafting group, IRTP PDP Transfer Denial Reasons Clarification, preparation for first conference call

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

hi all,

thanks for pulling this together Olof.

have we landed on a time for the May 15 
call?  looking at Glen's little scheduling gizmo, 
it looks like 1400 GMT is the winner so far.  is that where we're headed?
m

At 05:29 PM 5/8/2008, Olof Nordling wrote:
> Dear all,
> Welcome to the drafting group, first of all!
> Second, to those who have joined very recently, 
> please check out my previous email to the group, attached.
> Third, as promised by Glen, please find a 
> suggested agenda for our conference call next Thursday below.
> Fourth, as additional background, please find 
> (further below) relevant excerpts from the 
> minutes of the April 17 GNSO Council meeting, launching this group.
> Fifth, comments on the list would be useful also 
> before next Thursday ? we do have a rather tight schedule ahead of us.
> Very best regards
> Olof
>
> --------------------------------
> Suggested agenda for call Thursday 15 May
>
> 1.       Opening of meeting
> 2.       Appointment of chair (any volunteer? Please!)
> 3.       Agenda bashing
> 4.       Time plan (aiming for Council decision in Paris)
> 5.       Reason #5 ? discussion and choice of base text for drafting
> 6.       Reason #7 ? discussion and choice of base text for drafting
> 7.       Reason #8 ? discussion and choice of base text for drafting
> 8.       Reason #9 ? discussion and choice of base text for drafting
> 9.       AOB
>
> Excerpt from minutes of April 17 GNSO Council Meeting
>
> Item 8: Discussion on how to complete 
> deliberations on the 
> <http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/final-report-irt-policy-09apr08.pdf%20>Inter-Registrar 
> Transfer Policy Policy Development Process (IRTP PDP) ? Denial Definitions
> Olof Nordling reported that the 
> <http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/final-report-irt-policy-09apr08.pdf%20>Final 
> Report had been delivered before the due date 
> and proposed a drafting group be formed to 
> review the suggestions from constituency reports 
> and public comments to make recommendations on 
> final language that the Council could consider.
> Chuck Gomes supported Olof Nordling's suggestion 
> and believed that good registrar as well as 
> registry participation was important, but that 
> the drafting group membership should be open.
> Avri Doria drew attention to the difference, as 
> has been the custom to date, between the notion 
> of a drafting team, a short term, ad hoc group 
> with no formal charter and open participation, 
> and a working group with a formal charter and procedures.
> The ultimate goal of the drafting group will be 
> to propose policy changes that would remove the 
> current ambiguity for the reasons for the denial of transfers among registrars.
> Avri Doria moved a motion to:
>
> Create a drafting team charged with producing a 
> recommendation for Council deliberation that 
> includes precise wording for the 4
> provisions for reason for denial of 
> <http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/final-report-irt-policy-09apr08.pdf>Inter-Registrar 
> transfers.
> Drafting team is open to participants from all 
> constituencies, Nominating Committee appointees 
> and liaisons to the GNSO Council.
> The motion carried unanimously by voice vote.
>
> Decision 2: The GNSO Council approved the 
> creation of a drafting team charged with 
> producing a recommendation for Council 
> deliberation that includes precise wording for 
> the 4 provisions for reason for denial 
> of<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/final-report-irt-policy-09apr08.pd> 
> Inter-Registrar transfers.
> Drafting team is open to participants from all 
> constituencies, Nominating Committee appointees 
> and liaisons to the GNSO Council.
> Action Item:
>
> Avri Doria proposed:
>
> - working with Olof Nordling, the drafting 
> group's staff support, to develop a time line 
> that will allow for a public comment period and 
> the issue to be voted on during the June 2008 ICANN meetings in Paris.
> - a Wiki will be set up and the group will use 
> the mailing list archived at 
> <http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-trans-pdp/>http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-trans-pdp/ 
> with a modified set of subscribers
> - the drafting group should elect a chair from among the participants
>
> From: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "'gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx'" <gnso-trans-pdp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 02:44:50 -0700
> Subject: Drafting group - PDP on transfer denial reasons
> Thread-Topic: Drafting group - PDP on transfer denial reasons
> Thread-Index: AcikXYJj3SVi01kgTMql8XssgyXZ2g==
> Message-ID:
>
> <E9A3E17DE231744286429DD89E3B348C21420D33E5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
> boundary=_002_E9A3E17DE231744286429DD89E3B348C21420D33E5EXVMBX0162exc_
> Dear all,
> Thanks for joining this group! Others may still 
> join, so let's have a "soft launch" by noting 
> that there is useful background reading in the Final Report, posted at:
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/final-report-irt-policy-09apr08.pdf
> In particular, if you want a quick intro, 
> chapter 7 "Conclusions" gives an overview and 
> chapter 5 "Constituency views per issue" provides more details.
> Also, I've compiled a table, attached, with the 
> current texts of the provisions, the "Points of 
> Clarification document" (annexed to the Final 
> Report) suggestions and also proposed new texts, 
> as supplied by two constituencies. Please check 
> it out and we can have an email dialogue on this 
> list as to whether that's useful as a starting point.
> Very best regards
>
> Olof
>
> ---------------------
> Olof Nordling
> Manager, Policy Development Coordination
> ICANN
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 
> 269.23.11/1422 - Release Date: 5/8/2008 5:24 PM