<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-trans-wg] Short term planning group - Transfers Review
- Subject: Re: [gnso-trans-wg] Short term planning group - Transfers Review
- From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:55:55 -0400
Thanks to everyone that responded. I realize that some of your are
travelling and haven't had a chance to comment yet, so I will leave
the schedule issue open until it no longer matters. Let's proceed on
the basis outlined below unless challenges or scheduling friction
come up - I think we can flexible enough in this lightweight approach
to take into account the needs of the participants as we work through
the process.
I will tidy up the schedule and add some real dates and circulate
back to the group shortly.
Thanks again -
-ross
On 26-Oct-07, at 8:40 AM, Stacey King wrote:
Ross
This approach is fine by me as well. I look forward to working with
everyone.
Best
Stacey
Stacey King
Senior Internet Lawyer, IP
Richemont
15 Hill Street, London, W1J 5QT, England
Tel: +44 (0)20 7514 2764
Fax: +44 (0)20 7493 1018
Email: stacey@xxxxxxxxxxxx
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential - please
do not
cross-post. This communication is intended only for the use of the
addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified
that any review, reliance, disclosure, distribution or copying of this
communication may be prohibited by law. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify me immediately at
stacey@xxxxxxxxxxxx
and delete it and all copies from your system. Thank you.
On 26/10/07 03:50, "Ross Rader" <ross@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello all -
I think that we have a relatively small workload to deal with and can
probably deal with our task in a relatively lightweight fashion.
I would like to propose the following approach to our work.
a) everyone independently review the following document http://
gnso.icann.org/drafts/Transfer-Policy-Issues-23aug07.pdf (Oct 25 -
November 5)
b) comments, questions and clarifications back to the list for
discussion (Oct 25 - November 10).
c) each participant independently prioritizes the work items outlined
in the aforementioned document (a uniform template will be provided)
(November 10-15)
d) I will merge all of the prioritized list into a draft "master"
list (November 15)
e) teleconference to discuss and agree on final "master" list and
contents of communication back to Council. (sometime during the third
week of November based on availability)
Does this sound like a reasonable approach to everyone?
Thanks for volunteering for this effort.
-ross
On 24-Oct-07, at 6:20 PM, GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Dear All,
Pursuant to the Council resolution passed at the meeting on 20
September 2007
(http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-gnso-20sep07.shtml)
i) Whereas the GNSO Working Group on Inter-registrar Domain
Transfers Policy Review (Transfers WG) has completed its work, and;
ii) Whereas, the Transfers WG has provided a series of reports to
the GNSO Council for its consideration,
Be it resolved that;
i) The GNSO Council will issue the working group report entitled
"Advisory Concerning Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy" for
constituency and community review and comment for a period of no
less than 14 days, and;
i.a) pursuant to this comment period, all material commentary will
be summarized and reviewed by Council
i.b) pursuant to the review by Council that the current, or an
amended form of this report be provided to Staff for posting to the
ICANN web site as a community advisory.
ii) Pursuant to section 1.b of Annex A of ICANN's Bylaws, that the
GNSO Council initiate the formal GNSO Policy Development Process by
requesting the creation of an issues report evaluating issues
raised by the working group document "Points of Clarification Inter-
Registrar Transfer Policy.
(see http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/Transfer-Denial-
Clarifications-23aug07.pdf)."
iii). That the GNSO Council form a short-term planning group to
analyse and prioritize the policy issues raised in the report
"Communication to GNSO on Policy Issues Arising from Transfer
Review" before the Council further considers a PDP on any of the
work discussed in the report.
The short-term planning group has been formed with the following
participants under the leadership of Ross Rader:
Ross Rader - Registrar
Thomas Keller - Registrar
Tim Ruiz - Registrar
Barbara Steele - Registry
Ken Stubbs - gTLD Registry C
Pamela Miller - gTLD Registry C
Christian Curtis - NCUC
Paul McGrady - IPC
Stacey King - IPC
Mike O'Connor - CBUC
ICANN Staff support
Olof Nordling - Manager, Policy Development Coordination
Karen Lentz - gTLD Registry Liaison
Glen de Saint Gery - GNSO Secretariat
The Inter-Registrar Transfer policy: Clarification for reasons for
denial of a Transfer Request Issues Report can be viewed directly
at:
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/transfers/issues-report-transfer-
denial-clarifications-19oct07.pdf
The mailing list for the group is
<gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
public archives may be viewed at:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-trans-wg/
Please let me know if you are aware if anyone has been left off the
list.
Thank you very much.
Kind regards
Glen
--
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org
Ross Rader
Director, Retail Services
t. 416.538.5492
c. 416.828.8783
http://www.domaindirect.com
"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
- Erik Nupponen
Ross Rader
Director, Retail Services
t. 416.538.5492
c. 416.828.8783
http://www.domaindirect.com
"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
- Erik Nupponen
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|