RE: [gnso-trans-wg] "Beefed up" deletes section

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The changes Olof made look good to me.  In addition I support Tom's
suggestion for beefing up the notes for deleting the second part of
issue 15.  I believe that Tom was referring to the work of the original
IRTP task force; if I am correct, then I took a crack at beefing it up
as shown in the attached file.

Tom - Does what I did beef it up as you suggested?  Is it accurate?

All - Please comment as well.

Thanks,

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olof Nordling
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 4:55 PM
> To: gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-trans-wg] "Beefed up" deletes section
> 
> Dear all,
> Attached is my attempt to "beef up" our deletes section, with 
> changes shown as mark-up. I have essentially elaborated a 
> little on our reasoning without stretching the substance much 
> further. Enough? Too much? Too little? Foot faults? - Well, 
> please comment.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Olof
> 
> PS. As to "CT", my preliminary finding is that it is indeed a 
> misprint for "Consensus Ranking", which is the term used for 
> these values in Ross' group's final document to the Council. 
> I'm inclined to suggest replacing "CT" by "Consensus 
> Ranking", spelled out.
> 
>

Attachment: Transfer WG PDP Recommendations for deleting 15b.doc
Description: Transfer WG PDP Recommendations for deleting 15b.doc