RE: [gnso-trans-wg] Revised draft of IRTP PDP Recommendations

[Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Tom! ...and thanks Chuck for realizing that already!
Bestt

Olof


-----Original Message-----
From: tomwin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tomwin@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: den 13 mars 2008 21:20
To: Olof Nordling
Cc: Thomas Keller; 'Gomes, Chuck'; gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-trans-wg] Revised draft of IRTP PDP Recommendations


Hi Olof,

it was the original transfer working group a couple years ago.

tom

> Hi Tom,
> Happy to add your line to the issue 15 notes - just one question on that:
> does the task force you mention refer to the original transfers working
> group or Ross' priority setting group or something else?
>
> Best
>
> Olof
>
> ________________________________
> From: owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Thomas Keller
> Sent: den 13 mars 2008 10:24
> To: 'Gomes, Chuck'; gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: AW: [gnso-trans-wg] Revised draft of IRTP PDP Recommendations
>
> I can certainly only speak for myself but I consider this task as done ;).
>
> The only change might suggest would be in Olofs "beef-up" for issue 15 in
> which I would include that this issue has already been discussed in the
> previous taskforce and therefore must not be considered again.
>
> I also want to add that this was the most cooperative and productive ICANN
> work I had the pleasure to participate at for a long time. I hope we can
> carry this spirit on into future PDPs.
>
> Best,
>
> tom
>
> ________________________________
> Von: owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx]
> Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. März 2008 21:17
> An: gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: [gnso-trans-wg] Revised draft of IRTP PDP Recommendations
> As promised here is the revised draft document based on decisions we made
> in our meeting today.  Note that most changes are highlighted but that
> there are a few cases where I disabled the tracking function so that text
> changes would not be hidden because of order changes made.  Also note that
> I went ahead and changed CT to CR, understanding that Olof has the task of
> researching this and getting back to the group; therefore, we may need to
> go back and edit what I did in that regard depending on what Olof finds.
>
> We agreed that we should be able to finish our work via our email list and
> we set a target completion date of getting a final document to the Council
> NLT Wednesday, 20 March, one week before the next Council meeting.  Here
> are the action items agreed to on the call:
>
>  *   Chuck - prepare and distribute a revised document based on decisions
> made in today's call
>  *   Olof - research the use of "CT" in regard to the consensus rankings
> of policy issues
>  *   Olof - take a crack at 'beefing up' the explanations for why we
> recommend not initiating PDPs for five of the issues
>  *   All - review the latest revised document and identify on the list any
> suggested edits
>  *   All - stay as current as possible with the list email exchanges and
> respond in as timely a manner as possible and needed
>  *   Chuck & Olof - coordinate to finalize the document and send it to the
> Council.
> If I left anything off, please let me know.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chuck Gomes
>
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which
> it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
> unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately
> and destroy/delete the original transmission."
>
>