RE: [gnso-trans-wg] "Beefed up" deletes section
Looks sufficiently *beefy* to me. Also agree with Chucks further beef to 15. Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [gnso-trans-wg] "Beefed up" deletes section From: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, March 12, 2008 3:55 pm To: "gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx> Dear all, Attached is my attempt to "beef up" our deletes section, with changes shown as mark-up. I have essentially elaborated a little on our reasoning without stretching the substance much further. Enough? Too much? Too little? Foot faults? - Well, please comment. Best regards Olof PS. As to "CT", my preliminary finding is that it is indeed a misprint for "Consensus Ranking", which is the term used for these values in Ross' group's final document to the Council. I'm inclined to suggest replacing "CT" by "Consensus Ranking", spelled out.