ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: [gnso-trans-wg] "Beefed up" deletes section

  • To: "'Tim Ruiz'" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Olof Nordling'" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: AW: [gnso-trans-wg] "Beefed up" deletes section
  • From: "Thomas Keller" <tom@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:43:43 +0100

what we call bifi (pronounced beefy) in Germany ;)



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Tim Ruiz
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. März 2008 14:37
An: Olof Nordling
Cc: gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [gnso-trans-wg] "Beefed up" deletes section

Looks sufficiently *beefy* to me. Also agree with Chucks further beef to 15.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-trans-wg] "Beefed up" deletes section
From: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, March 12, 2008 3:55 pm
To: "gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-trans-wg@xxxxxxxxx>

Dear all,
Attached is my attempt to "beef up" our deletes section, with changes shown
as mark-up. I have essentially elaborated a little on our reasoning without
stretching the substance much further. Enough? Too much? Too little? Foot
faults? - Well, please comment.

Best regards


PS. As to "CT", my preliminary finding is that it is indeed a misprint for
"Consensus Ranking", which is the term used for these values in Ross'
group's final document to the Council. I'm inclined to suggest replacing
"CT" by "Consensus Ranking", spelled out.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy