RE: [gnso-travel-dt] Travel policy lunch with staff

["Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I would also agree that by increasing the GNSO Travel support budget there
is not direct new increase of costs to registrars.  These costs should not
become a reason to directly pass these costs on to registrars.

 

This is why i think getting a breakdown of the GNSO specific travel support
budge would be helpful

 

Zahid Jamil

Barrister-at-law

Jamil & Jamil

Barristers-at-law

219-221 Central Hotel Annexe

Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan

Cell: +923008238230

Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025

Fax: +92 21 5655026

www.jamilandjamil.com <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> 

 

Notice / Disclaimer

This message contains confidential information and its contents are being
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may
contain/are the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law,
and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client
privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of
any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing
it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or
incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written
permission and consent of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.

 

From: owner-gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: 05 March 2009 21:34
To: Olga Cavalli; gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx; Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: Re: [gnso-travel-dt] Travel policy lunch with staff

 

Thanks Olga.

I feel it important to add that the RC would not like to see any additional
funding impact the fees that registrars already pay to ICANN. During our
discussions yesterday, I got the distinct feeling that the amount needed for
the proposed full funding of would not be a significant amount compared to
the total budget. I would add that there have been suggestions that as there
is no ALAC summit next F, those costs might be applied to funding, rather
than increasing the full budget.

Thanks,

Stéphane Van Gelder
European RrC representative on the GNSO Council



Le 04/03/09 22:46, « Olga Cavalli » <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

Notes from the meeting with staff in relation with Travel Policy

Wednesday March 4th, 12:30 - 14 hs

GNSO council members present:

Zahid Jamil
Stefan Van Helder
Greg Ruth
Tim Ruiz
Olga Cavalli

Norbert Klein - Noncom

ICANN Staff

Kevin...
Doug Brent
Stacy Hoffberg

What we expressed:

All GNSO council members should be founded to attend ICANN meetings.
All council members volunteer their time and the GNSO amount of work is a
lot.
The amount of work in GNSO is highly increasing due to the GNSO
restructuring and the different steering commitees and working groups that
council members participate in.
It could be good if constituencies recieve funds and they distribute these
funds among their members.
If they want highly qualified people to volunteer their time to ICANN they
should pay to all travel expenses.

What Olga expressed: GNSO should have same treatment like Board members in
relation with travelling. GNSO is a lot of work and responsibility and we
all volunteer our time. 

What ICANN staff said:

Present ICANN Budget for travel 1,5 MUSD.
Today all ALAC is founded.
Some ccNSO members are founded.
Half GNSO members are founded.
GAC is asking for travel founds.
It could be helpful if GNSO prepares a draft document that justifies
founding all council members (workload, volunteer time, etc)
It may be a unified position or different views of the same issue but all in
a document produced by GNSO.
ICANN long term goal is to collect money to benefir larger community with
its work.


Zahid, could you please add more detail into the last part of the
conversation about keeping money from one year budget to the following year?
I could not get the whole idea of this last part of the meeting.


Please those who were presen add other comments that perhaps I missed. 

Next steps:

I could draft a new document taking these comments and using our previous
agreed document about travel policy and then I send it to the drafting team
list for your comments.
Then we should send it to GNSO list.

I will welcome your comments.
Regards
Olga