<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-travel-dt] Long term proposals for travel funding
- To: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-travel-dt] Long term proposals for travel funding
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 18:55:02 +0200
It was my understanding that our team¹s one overall message was that the
full Council should be funded.
I therefore agree that, as Tim suggests, we should work along those lines.
However, I find the current funding situation very unclear. Does the
drafting team not feel we would be better off waiting until the calls Kevin
Wilson has organised for next week are done to decide our next steps?
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 08/05/09 15:10, « Olga Cavalli » <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Thanks Tim, very helpful.
> Other comments?
> Best regards
> Olga
>
> 2009/5/8 Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Any long term proposal depends a lot on what the ICANN travel funding
>> program looks like going forward. We should discuss with Doug or Staff.
>> But we probably won't know for sure until sometime after Sydney.
>>
>> In the meantime, we could just present to Council parallel proposals
>> with the caveat that a long term plan cannot be decided until an ongoing
>> ICANN travel funding program is confirmed. One proposal would be based
>> on the existing ICANN travel funding program. The other based on what
>> the Council has asked for, full funding for all Councilors. It wouldn't
>> take long to pull together. We could then reconvene sometime after
>> Sydney.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [gnso-travel-dt] Long term proposals for travel funding
>> From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu, May 07, 2009 5:48 pm
>> To: "gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-travel-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Hi,
>> I am listening to the conference call recording and Chuck made an
>> interesting question, if we were making any progress in long term travel
>> funding proposals.
>>
>> I think we made some good progress during the Mexico meeting and
>> afterwards in our list, but then we lost this issue following the Sydney
>> one.
>>
>> Any ideas of how to move forward with this discussion?
>>
>> Some suggestions:
>>
>> I can draft a summary of discussed ideas during Mexico and in our list
>>
>> We can schedule a conference call¿
>>
>> Other comments are welcome.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Olga
>>
>>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|